3/19/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THERE ARE OTHER THINGS INVOLVED THAN JUST THE LINE BEING IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY, AND JOHN BOBBINS STATED THAT NORMALLY THIS REQUIREMENT IS RELATIVE TO A REGIONAL FACILITY IN WHICH FEDERAL FUNDS ARE INVOLVED. ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT FEEL THAT WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS. HE NOTED THAT AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY CONTEMPLATE THAT THE CUSTOMERS IN RANGE OF THAT LINE WILL HOOK UP, MR. LINER CONTINUED THAT ITEM 6 REFERS TO THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR THE IMPACT FEES, AND STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THOSE ORDINANCES IN EFFECT AT THE TIME WE ACCEPT PEOPLE ON THIS MAIN SO WE CAN FULLY REALIZE THE FINANCIAL BENEFITS TO THE CQUNTY FOR THE SERVICES WE ARE PROVIDING. ITEM % REFERS TO THE PROCEDURE FOR THE PROPER SEQUENCE OF PLANNING, PERMITTING, AND FEE ASSESSMENT, MR. LINER STATED THAT THERE ARE MANY PROJECTS WHERE THINGS HAVE GOTTEN INTO THE WRONG SEQUENCE, AND HE WISHES THE BOARD TO APPROVE THIS IN ORDER TO PRECLUDE THIS HAPPENING IN THE FUTURE. MR. LINER STATED THAT A PRIORITY AND ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURE SHOULD BE DEFINED, AND HE FELT THIS IS WHERE HE IS LOOKING FOR THE MOST HELP FROM THE BOARD. HE BELIEVED EVERYTHING WILL FALL IN LINE PRETTY WELL IF WE ARE ALLOWED TO CHARGE THE IMPACT FEES AND THE DEVELOPERS FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO THE SPECIFIC ACTION NEEDED, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT IF WE ESTABLISH AN IMPACT FEE, IT HAS TO BE DONE BY ORDINANCE AND HEARINGS HELD, AND MR. LINER APPARENTLY IS RECOMMENDING WE DON T TIE ANYONE ON UNTIL WE HAVE SUCH AN ORDINANCE IN EFFECT. MR. LINER STATED'THAT HE WISHED TO FIND A WAY TO PROCEED WITH THOSE PEOPLE WHO WANT EARLY CONNECTION. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT IF THE BOARD IS IN AGREEMENT WITH THE UTILITY DIRECTORS APPROACH, WE CAN ASK HIM TO COME BACK AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE WITH THE PROPOSED IMPACT FEES AND THEN ALLOW CONNECTION WITH THE PAYMENT OF THE PROPOSED IMPACT FEES WHILE WE GO THROUGH THE ORDINANCE PROCESS. 0 37 40 PAGE 37 MAR 19 1980