My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/19/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
3/19/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:52 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:19:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/19/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- MAR 191980 Pact `$ <br />COMMISSIONER DEESON ASKED ABOUT ITEM 5 WHERE IT SAYS "A <br />DEPOSIT OR BONDING AGREEMENT MUST BE WORED OUT." HE FELT IT WOULD <br />BE SIMPLER TO ELIMINATE THE BONDING AGREEMENT, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS <br />AGREED THAT IT WOULD BE. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF WE AREN�T ON SHAKY GROUND IF WE <br />SAY WE WILL ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH A DEVELOPER BASED ON AN <br />ORDINANCE WE MAY OR MAY NOT APPROVE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT WE HAVE BEEN MAKING INDI- <br />VIDUAL CONTRACTS WITH DEVELOPERS FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT WE MUST KEEP MOVING, AND ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS BELIEVED WE ARE PRESENTING A BASIC ORDINANCE IN THE PACKAGE, <br />AND HE FELT WE CAN GO TO A PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN DISCUSS IT. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF THIS ORDINANCE WOULD PERTAIN ONLY <br />TO 6TH AVENUE, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS ANSWERED THAT IT WOULD PERTAIN TO <br />ALL SYSTEMS IN THE COUNTY SERVICE AREA. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY NEXT ASKED IF THESE ARE THE SAME FIGURES <br />AS FOR WATER, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED HER THAT WE ARE PRESENTLY <br />CHARGING $ZOO FOR CONNECTION, BUT WE ARE SUGGESTING $250. <br />ENGINEER JAMES BEINDORF WISHED TO DISCUSS A SPECIFIC PROJECT <br />ON 6TH AVENUE. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE DEVELOPERS OF TROPIC <br />GROVE ARE PRESENT AT TODAY'S MEETING, AND THEY HAVE FOLLOWED THE <br />PROCEDURES MR. LINER HAS OUTLINED. THE PROBLEM THESE DEVELOPERS ARE <br />FACING IS ONE OF TIMING. MR. BEINDORF CONTINUED THAT HE IS CONFUSED <br />AS TO IMPACT FEES-AND"ESCROW. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE BOARD HAS THE <br />AUTHORITY TO ESTABLI-SH-THESE FEES WHERE A FRANCHISE IS REQUIRED AND <br />ASKED IF THERE IS.AN-Y WAY FOR TROPIC GROVE TO TIE INTO THE SEWER <br />SYSTEM AS OF MARCH 31ST BECAUSE THEY ARE IN A REAL FINANCIAL BIND. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE FELT THAT IN THOSE SITUATIONS <br />WHERE THE COUNTY HAS ENTERED INTO A FRANCHISE REQUIRING CERTAIN <br />CONNECTION FEES, THE COUNTY IS GOING TO BE BOUND BY THAT REGARDLESS <br />OF THE IMPACT FEES THEY CHARGE. <br />TO THE NON -FRANCHISED AREAS. <br />THE BOARD AGREED. <br />HE BELIEVED THE IMPACT FEES WILL APPLY <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.