My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/23/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
4/23/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:52 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:23:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/23/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN TO <br />SIGN A CONTRACT WITH THE .JOINT VENTURE OF O'HAIRE, PETERKIN & <br />MORAN, CHARTERED, AND DELOITTE, HASKINS & SELLS. <br />THE BOARD THEN REVIEWED THE MEMO OUTLINING THE NEGOTIATIONS <br />AND DISCUSSED THE DIFFERENCES IN THE HOURS EACH FIRM PLANNED TO <br />SPEND DOING THE AUDIT. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY REPORTED THAT BOTH FIRMS WERE EXTREMELY <br />COMPLIMENTARY IN THE ASSISTANCE THEY HAD RECEIVED FROM FINANCE <br />OFFICER BARTON AND HIS STAFF; AND A TOUR WAS ARRANGED BY THE FINANCE <br />OFFICER IN ORDER TO SEE THE SYSTEMS WITH WHICH THE FIRMS WOULD BE <br />WORKING. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THE FIRMS WOULD ALSO ADDRESS <br />THOSE ITEMS THAT MIGHT NOT BE IN COMPLIANCE, AS WELL AS THE DOLLARS <br />AND CENTS. <br />FINANCE OFFICER BARTON ASSURED HIM THAT THE STATE REQUIRES <br />THE ACCOUNTING FIRMS TO RENDER A MANAGEMENT LETTER, WHICH IS EQUIVALENT <br />TO WHAT THE AUDITOR GENERAL HAS INCORPORATED INTO HIS REPORT. HE <br />CONTINUED THAT THE BOARD AS WELL AS THE CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS WILL <br />HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ANSWER IN 20 DAYS, AND THEIR RESPONSES MUST <br />BE INCLUDED IN THE AUDIT REPORT TO THE AUDITOR GENERAL. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED WHAT PROCEDURE WOULD BE FOLLOWED <br />IF THE AUDIT IS DONE AND THE AUDITOR GENERAL REQUESTS ADDITIONAL <br />INFORMATION. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ADDED THAT THERE MIGHT BE AN EXTRA COST <br />IF THE STATE ASKS FOR SOMETHING THAT IS NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF <br />WORK CONTRACT. THE ATTORNEY THEN REFERRED TO THE ARTICLE REGARDING <br />WORK PAPERS WHICH WOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR THREE YEARS, AND WONDERED <br />WHAT HAPPENED TO THE WORK PAPERS AFTER THAT TIME. AT <br />ANDREW WILLIAMS, OF O'HAIRE, PETERKIN & MORAN, APPROACHED <br />THE BOARD AND ADVISED THEY ARE KEPT FOR THREE YEARS FROM THE ISSUE <br />DATE OF OPINION AND ARE THEN THROWN AWAY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THE COUNTY MAY WANT A PROVISION <br />IN THE CONTRACT THAT THE WORK PAPERS ARE TURNED OVER TO THE COUNTY. <br />13 <br />Book 43 PASE "7,- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.