My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/23/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
4/23/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:52 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:23:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/23/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 2 31980 <br />MR. WILLIAMS STATED THAT THEY WOULD KEEP THE WORK PAPERS, <br />AS THEY BELONG TO THE FIRM, AND WOULD KEEP THEM FOR THE COUNTY, IF <br />SO REQUESTED. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED IT DID NOT MATTER WHO KEPT THEM <br />BUT -IN DEALING WITH COUNTY GOVERNMENT, HE FELT THREE YEARS MIGHT <br />NOT BE SUFFICIENT TIME. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS BROUGHT UP A QUESTION REGARDING THE <br />TERMINATION. HE ADVISED THE BOARD WANTED THE RIGHT OF TERMINATION <br />OF THE CONTRACT AND WILL PAY FOR SERVICES THEIR FIRM HAS PROVIDED <br />UP TO THE DATE OF TERMINATION AS THIS BOARD MAY NOT WANT TO BIND A <br />FUTURE BOARD`. <br />MR. WILLIAMS REPLIED THAT IT SOUNDED FAIR TO HIM AS LONG <br />AS IT IS IN THE CONTRACT THAT THEIR FIRM WILL BE PAID UP TO THE TERM <br />OF THE CONTRACT. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS WONDERED IF THE CONTRACT INDICATES <br />THAT THE FIRM IS SET UP TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT WAS A VALID ISSUE AND EXPLAINED <br />THAT THE FIRM OUTLINES A SCOPE OF WORK THEY ARE TO D0, BUT THE STATE <br />MAY WANT SOMETHING THAT IS NOT IN THE SCOPE. HE ADDED THAT HE FELT <br />THE BURDEN OF THE FIRM IS MEETING THE STATES REQUIREMENTS. <br />MR. WILLIAMS ANTICIPATED THAT IF THE STATE HAS ANY QUESTIONS, <br />THE FIRM WILL ANSWER THE QUESTIONS ABOUT THEIR AUDIT. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THE STATE DID OUTLINE IN A <br />STATUTE THE RULES AND REGULATIONS, AND IF THEY REQUIRE ANYTHING OVER <br />AND ABOVE THAT, SHE THOUGHT IT WAS THE FIRM S RESPONSIBILITY TO GET <br />IT. SHE ADDED THAT AS LONG AS WE ARE SATISFIED THAT THE FIRM IS <br />GOING BY THAT STATUTE, WE HAVE SATISFIED THE LAW. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS, <br />FIRE AND WATER DISTRICTS, AND FEDERAL GRANTS. <br />MR. WILLIAMS ADVISED THEY WILL AUDIT ALL FUNDS UNDER THE <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND WILL AUDIT THE LANDFILL, FEDERAL <br />REVENUE SHARING, AND ANTI -RECESSION FUNDS (WHICH REQUIRES SPECIAL <br />REPORTS) AND WILL ALSO GIVE THE BOARD ASSURANCE THAT THEY HAVE NOT <br />14 <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.