Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding fill elevations and points from which to begin <br />measurements. <br /> Director Keating stated that the regulations for measurements are in the current ordinance. <br />Average natural grade or flood level is used for measuring structures, and finished grade applies to <br />walls and fences. A topographic survey is requested for unusual situations where there is a <br />significant grade difference, such as a dune. If finished grade is higher than the average natural <br />grade or flood level, measurements are taken from the lower grade. <br /> <br />The Board DIRECTED STAFF to clarify the definition <br />of “finished grade” and to define where “finished <br />grade” is to be measured from (finished floors, gates <br />and/or fences) and bring the item back. <br /> <br />11.A.2. CONSIDERATION OF CONSTRUCTION NUISANCE ISSUES <br />(JEFF HICKMAN) <br />(CLERK’S NOTE: CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF JULY 20, 2004) <br /> Planning Director Stan Boling stated that staff has referenced potential problems and <br />possible solutions in their memorandum of August 11, 2004 in the backup. <br /> Commissioner Lowther liked Approach C from staff’s recommendations, and <br />Commissioner Neuberger liked Approach A. He felt that these should be incorporated in a <br />document which could be given out with building permits, together with the option of warnings or <br />fines. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Neuberger to <br />adopt Approach A, SECONDED by Commissioner <br />Lowther for discussion. <br /> <br />AUGUST 17, 2004 29 <br /> <br />