My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/4/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
6/4/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:53 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:29:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/04/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VIOLATION OF PERFORMING THEIR DUTIES, AND THESE ARE WHAT ARE ENUMERATED. <br />WE ARE JUST SAYING THAT THESE THINGS CAN BE DONE, AND WE CANNOT SAY <br />ANYTHING UNLESS IT INTERFERES WITH THE INTERNAL RULES, <br />MR. NELSON FELT IT SHOULD STATE "WITHOUT INTERFERENCE WITH <br />THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR JOBS." <br />MR. PELLEGRINO COMMENTED THAT ITEMS 1-9 UNDER POLITICAL <br />ACTIVITY COULD BE DELETED, BUT WENT ON TO SAY THAT THE SUPERVISOR <br />NEEDS SOMETHING TO REFER TO IN MAKING A DECISION, AND HE FELT WE WANT <br />TO GIVE THE SUPERVISOR AS MANY TOOLS AS WE CAN IN THE MANUAL. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE DID NOT WISH ANYONE TO <br />INTERPRET THE RULES SO THAT THEY COULD CAMPAIGN WHILE WORKING. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED ON ITEM 3.05, PAGE 3-5, WHICH <br />STATED NO RELATIVE OF ANY EMPLOYEE OF THE COUNTY WHO HAS SUPERVISORY <br />AUTHORITY WILL BE HIRED WITHIN THE SAME DEPARTMENT, EXCEPT AS MAY BE <br />DETERMINED IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY. HE ASKED WHO WOULD <br />MAKE THAT DETERMINATION, AND MR. PELLEGRINO STATED THAT IT WOULD BE <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF WE NEED THAT EXCEPTION, ,AND <br />MR. PELLEGRINO FELT THERE ARE SITUATIONS THAT MAY OCCUR. HE STATED <br />THAT THEY WERE QUOTING STATE LAW AND FELT YOU WANT AS MUCH FLEXIBILITY <br />AS POSSIBLE SO YOU DON T PAINT YOURSELF INTO -A CORNER. --- <br />CHAIRMAN <br />- <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT PAGE 3-5, ITEM 3.06,DISCOURAGES <br />BUT DOES NOT RESTRICT EMPLOYEES FROM OTHER EMPLOYMENT DURING OFF <br />DUTY HOURS. HE ASKED IF, FOR INSTANCE, ONE OF OUR PLANNERS COULD GET <br />A JOB AS A CONSULTANT. <br />MR. PELLEGRINO GAVE THE EXAMPLE OF AN EMPLOYEE FOR WISHES <br />TO DO CERTAIN JOBS FOR A CONTRACTOR OFF DUTY. HE STATED THAT AS LONG <br />a <br />AS THAT CONTRACTOR DOES NOT CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY AND THERE IS NO <br />CONFLICT OF INTEREST, WE CANNOT RESTRICT THAT INDIVIDUAL, THOUGH WE <br />CAN DISCOURAGE HIM. MR. PELLEGRINO FELT WE COULD INSIST THAT THE <br />COUNTY IS HIS PRIMARY EMPLOYMENT AND IF WE NEED HIS SERVICES ON AN <br />EMERGENCY BASIS, HE HAS TO BE REASONABLY AVAILABLE. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR <br />SHALL DETERMINE WHETHER THERE IS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST. <br />JUN 41980 69 ou 41.3`46x,871 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.