6/18/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MR. HALL STATED THAT THE SHORTEST AND LEAST EXPENSIVE WAY TO COME IN WITH THE POWER LINE IS TO COME IN ON 43RD AVENUE, BUT THE SELLER WON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT IT. HE ADDED THE CITY WANTS TO GET THIS CONTRACT EXPEDITED AND THE CITY HAS INDICATED THEY HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH IT. CIRCLES. COMMISSIONER LYONS WONDERED HOW WE STOP GOING AROUND IN MR. HALL FELT THE ONLY WAY TO EXPEDITE THIS IS TO CHANGE THE ZONING TO M-1 AND LET THE BUYER, THE CITY AND THE UTILITY LINES GET ON WITH IT. CHET HOGAN, REPRESENTING THE BUYERS, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND STATED THAT THE BUYERS' ATTORNEY AND THE CITY ATTORNEY ARE IN AGREEMENT; AND THERE WILL BE A MARL ROAD WHICH WILL MEET THE SPECIFICA- TIONS. HE ADDED THAT THERE IS A 60' EASEMENT ON THE NORTH PART OF THE PROPERTY THAT THEY ARE NEGOTIATING TO GIVE TO THE CITY. PLANNER REVER INDICATED THAT THIS 60' EASEMENT WILL BE OWNED BY THE CITY BUT WILL BE IN THE COUNTY PROPER, AND IT WILL HAVE TO BE PAVED. HE ADDED THAT THE CITY WILL MAINTAIN IT. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE MARL ROAD AS THE BOARD EXAMINED THE SKETCH. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THE BUYER SHOULD BE MADE AWARE THAT THAT PORTION MIGHT HAVE TO BE PAVED, ATTORNEY COLLINS THEN DISCUSSED THE 20' EASEMENT COMING IN FROM THE NORTH DOWN TO THE PROPERTY LINE. HE ADVISED THERE WAS A MOTION MADE AT THE PLANNING $ ZONING MEETING FOR THE 20' EASEMENT NOT TO BE INCLUDED, BUT THE FINAL MOTION THAT WAS PASSED DID INCLUDE IT. THE ATTORNEY CONTINUED THAT HE HAD SOME RESERVATIONS ABOUT INCLUDING IT NOW AS THERE IS NO REASON TO REZONE THE 20' EASEMENT FOR THE M-1 THAT THEY HAD IN MIND. COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED REZONING THE PROPERTY AND LETTING THE APPLICANT WORK OUT THE PROBLEM OF INGRESS AND EGRESS. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER STATED HE AND HIS STAFF FELT THE 20' STRIP DID NOT HAVE TO BE REZONED, AS THE ROAD COULD BE ZONED EITHER WAY. ,u JUN 181980 - 43,Psa 7�7-