Laserfiche WebLink
410141 C: \�' I1Ful <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Jack Jennings, County Administrator <br />SUBJECT: Request for Administrative Procedure for Building <br />Permits <br />DATE: June 24, 1980 <br />Under previous practices, development construction was <br />possible prior to complete planning and approval by the County <br />as to the water and sewer utilities. To prevent this from <br />recurring, a procedure is proposed which inserts the review <br />and approval of the utility details before building permits <br />can be issued. An additional step will occur as shown in <br />the following list: <br />1. Plat or Site Plan Approval (Requiring Utilities conceptual <br />approval) <br />2. Zoning Permit <br />3. Utility Approval per attached procedure (previously approved <br />by the Board of Commissioners) <br />4. Building Permit (adding the letter of notification to the <br />Building official as an intermediate step in the process) <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR CONTINUED THAT IT SEEMED THAT AFTER <br />THE SITE PLAN HAD GONE THROUGH THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCEDURE AND <br />WAS SENT OVER TO BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER, SHE APPARENTLY FELT AT <br />THAT POINT EVERYTHING WAS CLEARED AND SHE COULD ISSUE A BUILDING <br />PERMIT. THE PROBLEM HERE IS THAT PEOPLE SHOULD GET AN APPROVED <br />UTILITY FRANCHISE BEFORE THEY CAN GET A BUILDING PERMIT: OTHERWISE, <br />THEY COULD GET A BUILDING HALFWAY UP AND POSSIBLY NOT GET A FRANCHISE.- <br />WHICH-THEN <br />RANCHISE,WHICH-THEN PUTS PRESSURE ON EVERYONE. A SIMPLE ADDITION TO THE <br />ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES SHOULD ELIMINATE THIS PROBLEM. <br />UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER STATED THAT WHETHER THIS INVOLVES <br />A FRANCHISE OR AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT, THIS PROCEDURE WILL WORK. <br />ESSENTIALLY, ITEM 3 - UTILITY APPROVAL AND NOTIFICATION BEFORE <br />ISSUING BUILDING PERMIT - IS WHAT HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE PROCEDURE, <br />7 <br />