Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. McMahon <br /> in response to Commissioner Lowther’s question explained that <br />Palm Beach County does it the same way as his recommendations. He provided more clarity using <br />Palm Beach, Miami/Dade and Broward Counties as examples pointing out the differences as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis responded to Director Keating’s question on how far back they <br />should go. He wanted to be able (from information he has) to determine, well in advance, what is <br />required to be done and the possible alternatives for resolving matters. Commissioner Bowden <br />thought that was a fairly reasonable expectation because of past mistakes. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation # 4: <br />Approved Project Trips (page 242 of backup) <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Davis, <br />SECONDED by Chairman Neuberger, to count non-vested <br />trips in aggregate of the approved subdivisions in Indian <br />River County, for planning purposes, but only count <br />vesting for concurrency. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis clarified his Motion for Commissioner Bowden. Attorney <br />Collins understood what Commissioner Davis was suggesting but thought it probably <br />would be a little more labor intensive. <br /> <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the <br />MOTION carried unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation #5: <br />Peak Hour Analysis <br /> <br />September 12, 2006 <br />26 <br /> <br />