Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Mora gave examples and explained why staff chose to go with p.m. trip counts only. <br /> <br />Mr. McMahon <br /> explained why he recommended using both roadway (link) traffic counts <br />\[morning (a.m.) and afternoon (p.m.) peak hour analyses\]. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Davis, <br />SECONDED by Chairman Neuberger, to approve staff’s <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />David Hall <br />, Vero Beach, was concerned that the Board was making motions without <br />public input. He questioned the height limitation on buildings in the five counties, and the <br />densities of the overall acreage that resulted in the numbers mentioned. <br /> <br />Mr. McMahon <br /> replied they were not making recommendation on changing densities in <br />this county; they were looking at traffic methodologies only. <br /> <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION. The Board <br />unanimously approved to maintain Indian River County <br />current practices of P.M. trip counts only. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendations # 8, 9: <br /> Deminimis / Link Assignments <br /> <br />Mr. Mora explained the Consultant’s recommendation, which staff did not agree with. He <br />felt the County’s current practice is very restrictive in comparison to the Consultant’s <br />recommendation, which he described as “way too lenient”. Planning and Zoning Commission <br />voted 4-3 to maintain our current practice. Staff believed a compromise might be the better way to <br />September 12, 2006 <br />27 <br /> <br />