Laserfiche WebLink
JUL 91900 <br />BooK 4 4 wcE 3 <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT EVEN THOUGH THIS IS UNDER <br />THE ATTORNEY'S MATTERS, HE WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM OUR PLANNING <br />DEPARTMENT BEFORE HE EVEN WOULD AUTHORIZE A PUBLIC HEARING. HE <br />ASKED IF THIS IS AN APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT'S DECISION, <br />AND ATTORNEY SOVIERO BELIEVED IT IS SIMPLY A REQUEST FOR A PUBLIC <br />HEARING TO CHANGE THE ZONING ORDINANCE. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THE REQUEST IS FROM THE <br />ATTORNEY OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OR FROM A SPECIFIC <br />APPLICANT. <br />ATTORNEY SOVIERO COMMENTED THAT THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING <br />AND ZONING MEETING INDICATE THAT MOTEL "6" PROPOSED THE AMENDMENT. <br />HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THERE ARE MOTELS IN THAT VICINITY THAT HAVE <br />HAD TO COMPLY WITH THE 300' REQUIREMENT. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD JUST AS SOON DENY <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED AND STATED THAT HE DID NOT <br />BELIEVE WE HAVE HAD A FORMAL REQUEST FOR A HEARING. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS, THAT THE BOARD DELAY A DECISION ON THIS ITEM <br />UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE DID NOT SEE ANY SENSE IN <br />PROLONGING THE AGONY, AND HE WOULD RATHER JUST DENY THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS WAS NOT SURE WE HAVE A REQUEST TO DENY. <br />IT WAS NOTED THAT ATTORNEY COLLINS APPARENTLY ASKED THAT THIS MATTER <br />BE BROUGHT UP. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD WITHDRAW HIS SECOND, <br />HOPING THAT WE WOULD HAVE ANOTHER MOTION TO DENY THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD HAVE A <br />HARD TIME CONVINCING HIM THAT A ROOM THAT SIZE WOULD BE SUFFICIENT.- <br />BUT <br />UFFICIENT, <br />BUT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS NOT PRESENT AND HE DID NOT FEEL <br />ATTORNEY SOVIERO HAS ALL THE INFORMATION. <br />� � r <br />