My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/16/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
7/16/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:53 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:11:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/16/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 161980 <br />BooK .44 eacE 92 <br />PROJECT COST SUMMARY <br />1. Total Construction Cost <br />$533,300 <br />2. Basic Engineering <br />(Based on standard FmHA Fee Curve <br />Includes Resident Inspection) 51,730 <br />3. Additional Services for Permits 2,500 <br />4. Legal and Administrative Cost @ 1 % 5,330 <br />5. Interest During Construction (61% for 6 Months) 16,000 <br />TOTAL PROJECT COST . . . . . $608,860 <br />It should be noted, the project cost shown above would be deducted from the <br />total project cost of the Proposed South County Water System Improvements. <br />The cost associated with the line extension to serve the proposed school is <br />shown for information. The exact cost to the School Board should be resolved <br />by the Board of County Commissioners. <br />MR. ROBBINS STATED THAT IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A TIE-IN <br />AT THE VISTA PROPERTIES PLANT, WHICH WOULD GO SOUTH ALONG U.S. #1 <br />AND WEST ALONG OSLO ROAD, THIS PORTION OF THE CONTRACT WOULD HAVE TO <br />BE BID - THIS WOULD GET THE BALL ROLLING. HE ADDED THAT THIS HAS TO <br />BE DONE PRIOR TO BOND VALIDATION, WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO HAPPEN BEFORE <br />THE END OF THIS CALENDAR YEAR. <br />ATTORNEY SOVIERO ADVISED THEY ARE WORKING TOWARDS THE <br />ACQUISITION OF THE VISTA PROPERTIES PLANT AND WILL TRY TO HAVE A <br />TENTATIVE AGREEMENT SOON. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE TIME ELEMENT, AND THE CONNECTION <br />FEE INVOLVED. <br />DR. BURNS, SCHOOL BOARD SUPERINTENDENT, COMMENTED THAT HE <br />FULLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE CONNECTION FEE IS PART OF THE BONDING AND <br />THE FRANCHISE FEE, AND THE SCHOOL BOARD IS PREPARED TO PAY THEIR <br />CONNECTION FEE AS A USER. <br />MR. ROBBINS STATED THAT THE DETAILS OF THE CONNECTION FEES <br />WILL HAVE TO BE WORKED OUT BETWEEN THE SCHOOL BOARD AND THE COUNTY. <br />DR. BURNS THOUGHT THE CONNECTION FEE WILL BE BETWEEN $15,000 <br />TO $20,000; THE SCHOOL BOARD HAS DISCUSSED THIS AND WERE VERY <br />ENTHUSIASTIC TO BE ON A GOOD WATER SYSTEM. <br />DISCUSSION ENSUED ABOUT THE COST AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT <br />APPROXIMATELY 3% OF THE TOTAL ENGINEERING FEE WOULD BE ATTRIBUTABLE <br />TO THE SCHOOL BOARD, <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS INQUIRED IF THERE WAS <br />A FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE WATER PLANT OPERATION, AS HE WAS <br />INTERESTED IN THE INCOME. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.