My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/17/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
09/17/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/2/2018 2:51:37 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Impact Fee Workshop
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/17/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4021
Subject
Impact Fee Update
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7318
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Administrator Baird reminded Mr. Paladin that today's discussion was about how <br />we could help commercial. <br />Mr. Paladin asked if the possibility of detouring trips, to lower commercial/ <br />industrial fees was considered, and Mr. Leftwich stated they would have to go back to surveys <br />to look at specific examples. <br />Mr. Paladin's other question was whether we could lower the fees enough to <br />justify our legal defense, even if we were not very conservative in the commercial/industrial <br />aspect. He did not think that not increasing impact fees in our current economic environment <br />would make a big difference; but thought what could make a big difference is to substantially <br />reduce the impact fees of commercial/industrial, or if it would be legally defensible if we had a <br />moratorium on not charging impact fees on commercial/industrial for twelve (12) months. <br />Attorney Collins did not think we could defend that under the current system and <br />methodology under which we developed this set of impact fees. <br />Administrator Baird added that it could, however, be taken out of our General <br />Fund or paid out of ad valorem taxes legally, if the Board desired. <br />Attorney Collins affirmed Mr. Paladin's statement that we could subsidize it and <br />that would be the only way to legally defend that. <br />Vice Chairman Davis asked if they could do a refund of impact fees for targeted <br />industries, and Attorney Collins reasoned that if they paid and collected, then that would be <br />tantamount to a grant or subsidy, so it probably could be done. Further discussions ensued <br />regarding funding sources that could be used. <br />September 17, 2008 14 <br />Public Workshop <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.