7/30/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUL 3 01980 80°g 44 ;%GJ96 MAYOR SCURLOCK THOUGHT THIS WOULD BE A PROPER THING FOR THE AD HOC COMMITTEE TO DISCUSS. HE CONTINUED THAT IT LSSA SEPARATE��I ENTITY, SO HE WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THE AIRPORT PAYING A REASONABLE AMOUNT. MR. LITTLE INTERJECTED THAT THE AD HOC COMMITTEE CAN WRITE TO THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR, AND THE COMMITTEE CAN COME UP WITH A RECOMMENDATION AS TO WHAT THE TRANSFER PAYMENT OUGHT TO BE, ATTORNEY SOVIERO REFERRED TO SECTION 6 ON PAGE 4 AND CLARIFIED THAT THE CONVEYANCE OF THE EQUIPMENT WOULD BE FREE OF CHARGE TO THE DISTRICT. HE SUGGESTED NOT HAVING A LIST OF ALL THE PERSONAL PROPERTY, BUT RATHER THAT THE AD HOC COMMITTEE COULD ACQUIRE THAT LIST AND IT COULD BE CONVEYED TO THE DISTRICT WITHOUT CHARGE - IN OTHER WORDS, JUST A GENERAL PROVISION FOR CLARIFICATION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED THAT JUST A SENTENCE OF INTENT WOULD BE SUFFICIENT, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT SENTENCE COULD BE ADDED ON EXHIBIT A. ATTORNEY SOVIERO NOTED THAT SECTION F, PAGE 5 REGARDING THE PENSION PLAN,HAS BEEN CHANGED SOMEWHAT. MR. NASON EXPLAINED THAT THE CITY MUST CONTINUE TO OVERSEE THE PENSION PLAN, AND THE MAYOR WILL STILL BE THE PERSON WHO REVIEWS THE PLAN - THE LIABILITY STAYS WITH THE CITY. ATTORNEY MCDONOUGH COMMENTED THAT THE STIPULATION GIVING PREFERENCE TO CITY EMPLOYEES WILL BE CHANGED AND ADDED TO THE AGREEMENT. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYEES. MAYOR SCURLOCK FELT THE TERMINATION OF EMPLOYEES WOULD BE PART OF THE CITY'S ONGOING SERVICE. ATTORNEY MCDONOUGH EXPLAINED THAT ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS WOULD BE THE TYPE THAT WOULD REQUIRE ATTENDANCE IN TALLAHASSEE OR ORLANDO FOR SOME TYPE OF ELABORATE HEARING. ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED STATING "EXCLUDING EMPLOYMENT RELATED MATTERS �� AND COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT WORDING ADDED.