7/30/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MAYOR SCURLOCK INTERJECTED HE WOULD LIKE TO LEAVE THE PHRASE THE WAY IT WAS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED, AND COMMENTED IF THERE WAS A DISPUTE, IT COULD BE SETTLED WITH THE TAPE OF THIS MEETING. COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THE CITY IS GOING TO CONTINUE TO DO ALL THEIR NORMAL THINGS, AND ANYTHING OVER AND ABOVE THAT .MOULD BE AN AUTHORIZED EXPENSE. ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED ADDING "EXTRAORDINARY" IN FRONT OF THE WORD "ADMINISTRATIVE." ATTORNEY SOVIERO REFERRED TO PAGE 6, ITEM 9, WHERE THE NUMBER OF STATIONS AND CHARGES WERE ELABORATED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT CHARGES WILL BE REVIEWED ANNUALLY BY THE CITY, AND THAT A PHRASE HAS BEEN DELETED. MR. LITTLE SUGGESTED ADDING "FOR THE ACTUAL COST OF" AFTER THE WORD "DISTRICT" IN THE SECOND LINE OF SECTION 91 PAGE 61 IN ORDER TO TAKE CARE OF THIS OMISSION. MAYOR SCURLOCK REFERRED TO SECTION 12 ON PAGE 7 CONCERNING A RECALL PROVISION IN THE DISSOLUTION OF THE DISTRICT. HE THOUGHT IT WOULD MAKE THE VOTERS IN THE DISTRICT FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE IF THEY HAD A VEHICLE TO MAKE THEIR DISPLEASURE KNOWN, AND HAVE A WAY TO TAKE IT TO THE COUNTY COMMISSION. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES. ATTORNEY MCDONOUGH NOTED THE WORDING COULD CLARIFY THAT 25% OF THE QUALIFIED VOTERS IN THE DISTRICT WOULD HAVE TO SIGN A PEITITION IN ORDER TO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING DISSOLUTION OF THE FIRE DISTRICT. ATTORNEY SOVIERO NOTED THAT TO BRING INDIAN RIVER SHORES INTO THE FIRE DISTRICT, THERE MUST BE A REFERENDUM ELECTION; THE OTHER OPTION WOULD BE TO CREATE A DISTRICT THERE. MR. KELTON ADVISED THAT TO CREATE A SEPARATE DISTRICT, THE GOVERNING BODY WOULD HAVE THE POWER OF MERGING TWO DISTRICTS. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT THE BOARD HAD TWO ALTERNATIVES: THE SECOND ONE WOULD BE LESS EXPENSIVE AND EASIER TO ACCOMPLISH - THE DISTRICT COULD BE ENLARGED. - 12 - bax. '107