My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/30/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
7/30/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:53 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:13:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/30/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 301980 <br />THE INTERIM ROLL APPROACH. <br />Boa 44 wE 132, <br />THE SCHOOL BOARD ALSO HAS INDICATED THEY <br />ARE VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF IT SINCE THEY WOULD HAVE TO START BORROWING, <br />POSSIBLY AS EARLY AS SEPTEMBER, AS MUCH AS $750,000 A MONTH. MAYOR <br />NOLAN HAD NO OBJECTION TO THIS APPROACH. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE FACT THAT ALL THE TAXING BODIES <br />CAN T HAVE HEARINGS ON THE SAME DAY AS THE COUNTY, AND IT WAS AGREED <br />THAT ALL WOULD HAVE TO WORK TOGETHER ON THIS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THERE IS A GOOD BIT OF CONFUSION.- <br />BUT <br />ONFUSION, <br />BUT FELT THE AMENDMENT TO THE TRIM BILL MAY ALLOW SOME FLEXIBILITY <br />ON TIME SCHEDULES FOR THIS YEAR, HE EXPLAINED THAT WE ARE GOING TO <br />COURT BECAUSE THE LEGISLATURE HAS PUT ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN THE <br />POSITION OF NOT KNOWING WHAT TIME FRAMES HAVE TO BE MET AND THEREBY <br />LEAVING THEM OPEN TO LITIGATION FROM TAXPAYERS. HE BELIEVED GOING <br />TO COURT WILL HELP AVOID SOME OF THIS. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION SUIT OR <br />WHETHER EVERY COUNTY HAS TO GO TO COURT ON THEIR OWN, AND ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS STATED THAT EVERY COUNTY HAS ITS OWN RESPONSIBILITY. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT WE HAVE TO GIVE MR. LAW MILLAGES <br />BASED ON THE INTERIM ROLL TO CERTIFY THE BUDGET, AND MR. LAW AGREED <br />THAT WE WOULD BE GIVING HIM THE MILLAGE ON AUGUST 20TH. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED WHEN WE WOULD HAVE TO COMPLETE <br />BUDGET HEARINGS - WOULD MR. LAW NEED THIS ON THE 20TH OR FIVE DAYS <br />PRIOR? <br />MR. LAW STATED THAT HE WOULD GIVE THIS TO THE BOARD ON THE <br />13TH, AND THEN THE BOARD WOULD GIVE IT BACK TO HIM ON THE 20TH. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF IT IS REASONABLE TO EXPECT WHEN YOU <br />GET THE HIGHER ROLL THAT THE ASSESSED VALUATIONS WILL BE HIGHER THAN <br />ASSESSED ON THE LAST ROLL, AND MR. LAW STATED THAT IT APPEARS THAT WAY. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT WE ARE GOING TO OPERATE <br />ON THIS INTERIM ROLL, WHICH IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE LESS THAN THE <br />FINAL ROLL. WE ARE GOING TO SET MILLAGE ON SOMETHING THAT WILL BE LESS <br />THAN THE FINAL VALUATION, AND HE NOTED THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO GET <br />CAUGHT IN SOME KIND OF WEB BECAUSE WE ARE LOOKING AT TWO DIFFERENT <br />VALUATIONS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.