Laserfiche WebLink
CLIFF REUTER APPROACHED THE BOARD AND STATED HE WANTED TO <br />TALK ABOUT ATTACHING HIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE WATER PLANT, <br />WHICH IS LOCATED ACROSS THE STREET. HE STATED THEY ARE ABOUT 400' <br />FROM THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND BEING SO CLOSE TO THE PLANT WOULD <br />SEEM ECONOMICAL TO TAP IN FOR WATER. MR. REUTER NOTED THEY WOULD <br />PROVIDE TAP -IN FEES AND MONTHLY WATER SERVICE FEES. HE REPORTED THEY <br />WOULD NOT START WITH A LARGE OPERATION BUT OVER A PERIOD OF TIME, IT <br />WOULD BE A WORTHWHILE ADDITION TO THE WATER PLANT, WHICH WOULD HELP <br />DEFRAY THE'COST OF OPERATION. MR. REUTER POINTED OUT THAT THE IDEA <br />OF PROVIDING MUNICIPAL WATER SERVICE WOULD BE GOOD TO PREVENT <br />INDIVIDUAL WELLS, AND IF IT CAN BE WORKED OUT, THEY COULD GO INTO THE <br />TAXING DISTRICT OR DO WHATEVER WOULD BE THE BEST WAY IN ORDER TO TAP <br />INTO THE WATER SUPPLY WHENEVER IT IS READY. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND THE BOARD WAS CONCERNED ABOUT <br />GIVING PREFERENCE TO ONE PROPERTY OWNER WHO IS OUTSIDE THE ORIGINAL <br />TAXING DISTRICT. THE BOARD THEN REVIEWED THE MEMORANDUM FROM <br />UTILITIES DIRECTOR LINER, AS FOLLOWS: <br />c7 <br />MEMO <br />Y <br />TO: Neil nelson Asst. Administrator <br />FROM: G. Liner, Utilities Director <br />SUBJECT: Response to proposal of letter, Reuter to Siebert, <br />dated 7/24/80, "Water to our 60 acres south of <br />Oslo Road", <br />DATE: August 1, 1980 <br />In response to your request, I am responding to the <br />subject letter with my recommendation. <br />The letter to us requests that this project be considered <br />for county water when our plant is "ready the first of 1982". . . <br />I see no reason why we should not be able to comply with supplying <br />water to that project - subject to assessments per the utility <br />ordinances, the developer's agreement, and developer procedures <br />which had been previously approved by the Board of Commissioners. <br />AUG 131980 33 Boa • e c $ <br />