Laserfiche WebLink
AUG 131980 <br />600K 44 pia 251 <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED HE WAS NOT SURE WE WOULD EVER <br />BE IN A POSITION TO MAKE A COMMITMENT TO ANY SINGLE DEVELOPER,iAS IT <br />WAS A DIFFICULT THING TO DO. HE KNEW THAT THERE WERE A LOT OF OTHER <br />PEOPLE WHO WOULD ALSO LIKE TO KNOW WHEN SERVICE WOULD BE AVAILABLE AT <br />THAT LOCATION. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT MR. REUTER WAS THE BEGINNING <br />OF THE RIPPLE TO THE QUESTION FOR WHICH WE'HAVE NO ANSWER. SHE THEN <br />ASKED IF, IN THE MOTION, WE COULD ASK THE ENGINEERS TO COME UP WITH <br />A PROPOSAL OF PHASE 3 OF THE EXPANSION FOR THE ENTIRE DISTRICT. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS THEN WITHDREW HIS MOTION, AND COMMISSIONER <br />WODTKE WITHDREW HIS SECOND, <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER Loy, THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE COUNTY <br />ENGINEERS, BE AUTHORIZED TO ANALYZE THE WATER AVAILABLE IN THAT AREA; <br />THE PHASING OF HOW THAT WATER SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED IN THE FORESEE- <br />ABLE FUTURE WITHIN THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER TAXING DISTRICT; AND COME <br />UP WITH A PLAN OF PHASING FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THIS BOARD <br />WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT WE ARE LOOKING TO THE <br />ENGINEERS TO TELL US WHAT MAKES THE MOST SENSE IN THIS MATTER. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />WINTER BEACH CEMETERY EXPANSION REQUESTED BY WINTER BEACH CEMETERY <br />ASSOCIATION <br />THE BOARD THEN CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING LETTER: <br />