My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/13/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
8/13/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:53 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:15:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/13/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F' <br />AUG 131980 <br />aoox 44 FQcE 275 <br />MR. MARSH POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL 10' <br />EASEMENT, AND THEY WILL PUSH TO GET, ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE ROAD IS A DEDICATED ROAD <br />AND WONDERED WHY THE ADJACENT EASEMENT IS PRIVATE. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS COMMENTED THAT THE ONLY RIGHT-OF-WAY <br />THE COUNTY HAS IS WHAT THEY TOOK BY MAINTENANCE SOMETIME AGO. IT IS <br />A VERY RESTRICTED ROAD, AND IT WILL BE A VERY DIFFICULT ROAD TO MAIN- <br />TAIN BECAUSE OF THE PROBLEM WITH THE TREES AND ROOTS. HE ASKED IF <br />THE ATTORNEY WAS TALKING ABOUT THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND THE <br />ATTORNEY EXPLAINED THAT HE MEANT THE ADJACENT EASEMENT. <br />MR. MARSH NOTED THAT THIS WAS REQUESTED IN THE TECHNICAL <br />REVIEW COMMITTEE, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR HAD STATED THAT HE DID NOT <br />WANT TO HAVE THE COUNTY HAVE TO MAINTAIN ALL THAT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED THE TREES FALLING OVER THE ROAD, <br />AND STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO ELIMINATE THE TREES FROM COUNTY OWNERSHIP, <br />IF POSSIBLE. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE COULD UNDERSTAND THE <br />INTERNAL EASEMENTS BEING PRIVATE, BUT FELT WE MAY BE HEADING FOR <br />TROUBLE IN THE LONG RUN IF THE EASEMENT ALONG THE ROAD BECOMES A <br />PRIVATE EASEMENT, <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT HE WOULD GO ALONG WITH <br />TAKING THE NORTH -SOUTH EASEMENT AS THERE IS NO REASON FOR IT TO BE <br />PRIVATE, BUT BELIEVED WE SHOULD LEAVE OUT THE EAST -WEST EASEMENTS AS <br />THE COUNTY DOES NOT WANT TO HAVE TO KEEP THOSE DITCHES OPEN. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THE CLEANEST WAY TO DO THIS IS TO <br />ABANDON THIS PLAT AND START ALL OVER UNDER TODAY IS REGULATIONS. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT HIS UNDERSTANDING IS IF <br />YOU FILE A REPLAT OF A PLAT, THE REPLAT THEN BECOMES THE PLAT, HE <br />NOTED THAT THIS IS NOT THE PLAT THAT WILL GO ON RECORD. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THIS PLAT DOES NOT COVER IT ALL. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THEY ARE ANTICIPATING RE - <br />PLATTING THE EXISTING PLAT. THERE ARE NO EASEMENTS ON THE OLD PLAT, <br />AND HE BELIEVED THE LINES COINCIDE WITH ALL THE SIDE LOT LINES. THEY <br />60 <br />k <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.