Laserfiche WebLink
4. PRESENTATION OF FINAL SCHOOL CONCURRENCY <br />PILOT COMMUNITY WORK PRODUCTS: <br /> <br />DRAFT PUBLIC SCHOOL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT <br /> <br /> <br />DRAFT PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT <br /> <br /> <br />DRAFT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT <br /> <br />REVISIONS <br /> <br />Jeanne Mills, JD, AICPDavid DeYoung, <br /> of Jeanne Mills and Associates, LC and <br />AICP <br />of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., through a PowerPoint slide show, presented the <br />School Concurrency Final Report as drafted (a copy is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the <br />Board). <br /> <br />Ms. Mills <br /> recapped the purposes and necessity of school concurrency, which is to <br />ensure that adequate school capacity would be available to support the impact of residential <br />development. She also provided a brief history of the existence of school concurrency, which <br />dates back to a 1985 Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development <br />Regulations Act. She noted that based on Senate Bill 360 by the Florida Legislature, school <br />concurrency is now mandatory in this State. It requires that all local governments adopt school <br />concurrency provisions as part of their Comprehensive Plan by 2008, with the exception of the <br />Town of Orchid, which is exempt. <br /> <br />Ms. Mills <br /> outlined the penalties for non-compliance with the requirements, and <br />discussed the draft documents that Pilot Project Communities needed to prepare as required by the <br />Department of Community Affairs (DCA). She also discussed the School District’s Five-Year <br />Capital Facilities Plan, Municipal Data, Level of Service Standards and presented a Proposed Tier <br />noting that the school district by the year 2010 or 2011 would be able to meet its backlog and <br />would be at a desired level of service of 100%. <br />September 26, 2006 <br />3 <br /> <br />Joint Concurrency Workshop <br /> <br />