My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/7/2005
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
09/7/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 1:46:18 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:00:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/07/2005
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3032
Book and Page
129, 492-515
Subject
Budget Meeting
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
272
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
overtime, and wage increases but Mr. Coffey persisted in his questioning, saying that the public <br />has the right to know how their tax dollars are being used. <br />County Administrator Baird explained further, but Mr. Coffey continued to question <br />while insisting the public has the right to know. <br />Sheriff Raymond repeated his prior offer to go over every part of his budget with <br />Mr. Coffey and stated he had invited an individual from the Taxpayers Association to attend all the <br />budget reviews. He noted that the Citizens Review Committee meets regarding the Sheriff’s <br />budget and they have found the expenditures for the Sheriff’s Office to be reasonable. <br />Commissioner Wheeler believed we definitely need the first expansion, but the <br />process used to allocate the funding for the additional expansion was not done as well as it could <br />have been done. He felt the additional expansion was based on a spike in the jail population and <br />had not really been completely looked at by this Board. He understood Mr. Coffey’s concerns. <br />Sheriff Raymond repeated that Mr. Coffey has failed to take advantage of his <br />previous offers for explanations. <br />Additional discussion ensued. <br />Duane Weise <br /> had prepared a chart comparing FY 2004/2005 to FY 2005/2006. He <br />had also read where Sebastian has cut their employee benefit program and suggested the County <br />consider doing a similar cut in benefits. <br />County Administrator Baird explained that the County must put together the budget <br />each year according to and as required by State law. He specified that the County’s budget is the <br />second largest and that the School Board is the largest and that not everyone pays into all five of <br />the municipal taxing districts. He explained also that Sebastian bid their benefits out because of a <br />large increase by their insurance provider and noted that sometimes newspapers have a problem <br />with math in their reporting. Although the County did not reach rollback, he specified that staff <br />made every attempt to do so. He also stated the County will look at benefits again in the next year <br />or two and recounted that the County is self-insured. <br /> Mr. Weise’s <br />In response to suggestion to examine cost for postage, telephone, and <br />other recurring costs, County Administrator Baird explained that high costs in both items are due <br />SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.