Laserfiche WebLink
not use it during the term of their contract without going through their approval; and when the <br />contract is up the matter could be reviewed by staff, as to the real needs, as far as public safety <br />on that roadway. <br />Jens Tripson, Vero Beach, and Chairman of the Lands Advisory Committee, <br />encouraged the Board to go with staff's recommendation and approve the abandonment of the <br />right-of-way. <br />C.N. Kirrie, said he had no problem with the abandonment except that the map <br />shows the drawback from the northerly lot line of Lot 19, and Lots 19 and 15 do not match in <br />their northern boundaries by 60 feet. Consequently, if this abandonment is approved with the <br />current verbiage in the application to abandon, it would be incorrect. He asked that the Board <br />puts this on hold until the written documentation coincides with the map. <br />Director Boling showed a sketch of the abandonment and said staff would check <br />the verbiage, but this was the legal description staff was going by. <br />Vice Chairman Davis acknowledged Mr. Kirrie's point that if there was a <br />discrepancy with the verbiage (the legal description versus the legal sketch) then they should <br />have it corrected. <br />Chief of Environmental Planning Roland DeBlois said the legal/general <br />description in the application itself evolved during the review process to the point where the <br />actual legal description and the resolution does reflect that pullback of 136 feet, but he would <br />double check to confirm. He pointed out that the legal description was modified through the <br />course of the review process to allow for that pullback. <br />There were no other speakers and the Chairman closed the Public Hearing. <br />September 9, 2008 28 <br />