Laserfiche WebLink
77 <br />i <br />r <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT AT THE NEXT MEETING WITH THE CITY <br />TEAM WE WILL BE TALKING ABOUT THE PROPOSED SOUTH BEACH WATER AGREEMENT <br />AS WELL AS THE MID FLORIDA AREA. THE CITY SPECIFICALLY WANTED TO <br />RECEIVE BACK THE REPORT AS TO THE EFFECT OF SERVICING THE SOUTH BEACH <br />ON THE RATES AND WATER SUPPLY. THE ATTORNEY CONTINUED THAT IN CONJUNCTION <br />WITH THAT ASPECT OF SUPPLYING WATER, THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE <br />DEVELOPERS IN THREE SECTIONS OF SOUTH BEACH - FROM BASICALLY CASTAWAY <br />COVES SOUTH TO THE MOORINGS WATER TANK - FROM THERE SOUTH TO SEMINOLE <br />SHORES, AND THEN SOUTH OF SEMINOLE SHORES DOWN TO THE SOUTH COUNTY LINE. <br />IT HAS BEEN INDICATED TO THEM THAT IF THE COUNTY REACHES AN AGREEMENT <br />WITH THE CITY, IT WILL BE THE COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PUT IN ALL <br />THE FACILITIES AND THEN THE COUNTY WILL LOOK TO ALL THE PEOPLE WHO <br />WILL BENEFIT FROM THE WATER TO PAY FOR THESE FACILITIES. THE ATTORNEY <br />CONTINUED THAT HE HAS REVIEWED WITH THEM THE CONCEPT WE HAD RE SIZING <br />OF THE LINE, COST OF LINE AND WHAT WAS GOING TO BE EXPECTED OF THEM. <br />THEY, IN TURN, INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD MAKE COMMITMENTS TO THE COUNTY <br />AS TO WHAT THEY WOULD DO AND WHAT THEY WOULD PAY SO WE CAN TRY AND TIE <br />THESE AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY WITH THE ACTUAL SUPPLYING OF THE WATER. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH BOND COUNSEL <br />REGARDING SETTING UP BOND ISSUES SOUTH OF THE MOORINGS TO BE PAID <br />BACK ON AN ASSESSMENT BASIS. THE CONCEPT IS TO TAKE A 20" LINE TO <br />THE WATER TANK AND THEN 12" TO THE SOUTH COUNTY LINE. THE REASON FOR <br />THE SIZING OF THE LINE IS MORE RELATED TO THE HYDRAULICS OF GETTING <br />THE WATER WHERE YOU WANT IT AT THE RIGHT PRESSURES THAN MERELY SUPPLYING <br />THE WATER. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT THE <br />WHOLE SOUTH BEACH AND ASKED IF THAT IS TIED UP WITH THE INTERLOCAL <br />AGREEMENT WITH WATER AND SEWER. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS REPLIED THAT IF HE MEANT BEFORE WE PROCEED <br />WITH THE WATER DO WE HAVE TO PROCEED WITH THE 201 PROGRAM AGREEMENT, <br />HE BELIEVED THE ANSWER IS NO. HE EXPLAINED THAT THEY HAD BEEN WORKING <br />ON AN OVERALL CONTRACT ON SEWER AND WATER WITH THE CITY AND INDIAN <br />41 <br />AUG 2 71980 <br />BOOK 44 FADE 388 <br />