Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />BOOK 44 P,aGE 501 <br />With the development of this road, plans should include the acquisition <br />of additional right-of-way for future road expansion as development in- <br />creases in the area. As a major collector, it is suggested that a 100 <br />foot right-of-way be attained. Conceivably, acquisition of this right-of- <br />way could be traded off for payment toward present road paving'. Future <br />development along this stretch of 16th Street would require dedication of <br />additional right-of-way as part of the development process. <br />Your p rens::'' or Do -3 i :.'%': 1 -.4ao4�n ' : i,? t'i <br />''.7 : ;7 r i �r � 4 r.--,. ; <br />owners. IfVthe ystaff can be of any further assis <br />please call on us. <br />DMR: j t <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br />MMUMMOAVID M. REVER • DFECTOR <br />2Ud'I 'K+n+AVE. VERO EEAON FL 32960 <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />September 4, 1980 <br />Neil A. Nelson, County Administrator <br />Paving Request of 16th Street <br />Enclosure number one: George Beuttell's letter of August 14, 1980 <br />Enclosure number two: Neil A. Nelson's letter of October 29, 1979 to <br />Mr. Beuttell. <br />Enclosure number three: David Rever's memo to Neil A. Nelson, September <br />2, 1980. <br />Enclosure number one is a request from George Beuttell to Commissioner <br />Alma Lee Loy to have the unpaved portion of 16th Street between 43rd Avenue <br />and Kings Highway paved. <br />Previously, I had written to Mr. Beuttell providing him with information <br />concerning the 75 percent paving plan. <br />(Enclosure number two) On August 20, 1980 I contacted Mr. Beuttell and he <br />stated that the residents did not want to participate in the cost and felt the <br />County should pave the road at no cost to the residents. Mr. Beuttell's request <br />was staffed through the Planning & Zoning Director,and he feels that even though <br />16th Street will become a major collector in the future, the present development <br />would not warrant total cost assumption by the County. <br />Lnc10su;-2 number .e; Concur wit:f,;_ <br />It is recommended that 16th Street not be paved at this time and that it <br />be considered in next years paving plan. <br />�. _�Q 1) <br />Ne it . Ne son, Toun dminsitrator <br />NAN:ms <br />Enclosures <br />� - s <br />