My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/24/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
9/24/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:23:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/24/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOTED THAT THERE IS A HIGH DEMAND OF PEOPLE WHO WANT TO LIVE ON THE <br />WATER, AND SINCE THERE ARE BRIDGES, THERE IS GOOD ACCESS, MR. HELIE <br />NEXT DISCUSSED THE BEARING CAPACITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND - THE NUMBER <br />OF PEOPLE CAN BE DETERMINED BUT MUST BE BASED ON TRANSPORTATION <br />AND POTABLE WATER. HE ADVISED THERE IS A VEIN OF WATER AT THIS <br />LOCATION WITH REVERSE OSMOSIS, AND POTABLE WATER IS PROBABLY AVAILABLE. <br />MR. HELIE STATED THAT THE OWNERS WANT TO PUT DOWN A TEST WELL. HE <br />COMMENTED THAT ON A BARRIER ISLAND, THERE IS A LIMITING FACTOR TO <br />GROWTH. MR. HELIE NOTED THAT WHEN YOU GET A ZONING CHANGE, IT JUST <br />GIVES THE DEVELOPER MORE ASSURANCE TO GO AHEAD AND SPEND MORE MONEY. <br />HE ADDED THAT THIS PROJECT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE TRAFFIC FLOW <br />ON A -1-A. <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD HAS BEEN <br />INVOLVED IN THIS PARCEL BEFORE - THE OLD ENOS SUBDIVISION. <br />.JOHN ROBBINS, ENGINEER, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND NOTED <br />THAT RELATIVE TO THE WATER ISSUE, REVERSE OSMOSIS WOULD BE THE ONLY <br />WAY. HE CONTINUED THAT RELATIVE TO THE SEWAGE TREATMENT IN THAT AREA, <br />SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES OF A SECONDARY TREATMENT, WITH AN EFFLUENT <br />TECHNIQUE OF PERCOLATION OR SUBSURFACE PERCOLATION, WOULD BE VIABLE. <br />MR. ROBBINS STATED THERE IS A PROCEDURE THAT THE PETITIONERS MUST GO <br />THROUGH UNDER THE FRANCHISE REQUIREMENTS, AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL <br />COULD NOT PROCEED UNTIL UTILITY APPROVAL WAS RECEIVED; THERE ARE <br />VARIOUS REGULATORY AGENCIES THAT WOULD HAVE TO GIVE THEIR APPROVAL - <br />THESE ARE AREAS THE PETITIONERS WILL HAVE TO ADDRESS. MR. ROBBINS <br />COMMENTED THAT FROM AN ENGINEERING STANDPOINT, THIS WOULD REQUIRE A <br />CLOSE LOOK SO THAT CERTAIN BUFFERS ARE THERE; THAT RESPONSIBILITY <br />LIES WITH THE DER IN THEIR REQUIREMENTS, BUT THE ENGINEERING WOULD <br />HAVE TO BE DONE TO INSURE THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE MET. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT THE QUESTION OF WATER <br />AND SEWER IS SOMETHING THAT IS WELL UNDER CONTROL BY THE EXISTING <br />AGENCIES. <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON ADVISED THAT THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT <br />IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN,BUT IT IS TO BE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE <br />PROPERTY, AND WEST OF A -1-A. <br />19 SOAK f <br />SEP 2 4 1980 'A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.