My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/8/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
10/8/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:30:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/08/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-I <br />OCT 81980 <br />aaoK 4, FAX"876 <br />MR. REINHOLD INTERJECTED THAT HE DIDN'T FEEL THEY WERE <br />TOO REMOTE FROM THEIR WORK. HE COMMENTED THAT HE DID NOT COME TO <br />CRY, COMPLAIN, OR APOLOGIZE - HE WAS JUST LOOKING FOR DIRECTION. <br />MR. REINHOLD WENT ON TO SAY THAT MANY OF THE ITEMS IN QUESTION WERE <br />NOT THE FAULT OF THE CONTRACTOR, AND HE DID NOT THINK THAT HIS PEOPLE <br />WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR DELAYS IN THE PROJECTS. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED MR. REINHOLD WHAT THE BOARD COULD <br />DO TO HELP GET THE JOB DONE BY FEBRUARY. <br />MR. REINHOLD THEN DISCUSSED THE CHANGES THAT ARE GOING TO <br />BE MADE IN THE COURTROOM AREA - HE WANTED TO BE TOLD WHAT THEY WERE. <br />HE STATED THAT MR. KONTOULAS AND THE ARCHITECT TOLD HIM THAT ALL <br />THE FINISHES WERE GOING TO BE CHANGED. <br />MR. KONTOULAS REITERATED THAT UNTIL HE HAD SOMETHING IN <br />WRITING, MR. REINHOLD SHOULD CONTINUE HIS WORK. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THAT WAS NOT FAIR IF MR. REINHOLD <br />HAD BEEN TOLD THERE WAS GOING TO BE A CHANGE. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE PROCEDURES INVOLVED IN A <br />CHANGE PROPOSAL, AND IT WAS FELT THE CHANGE IN THE COURTROOM WAS A <br />BIG ITEM. <br />MR. REINHOLD COMMENTED THAT WHEN THEY RECEIVE A CHANGE <br />PROPOSAL, THEY HAVE TO ASSEMBLE IT, SEND IT OUT TO THE VARIOUS SUB- <br />CONTRACTORS, AND THIS TAKES SEVERAL WEEKS. HE WAS HOPEFUL THAT THEY <br />COULD ALL WORK TOGETHER IN ORDER TO GET ON WITH THE JOB. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE PANELING REQUESTED BY .JUDGE <br />SMITH SEVERAL MONTHS AGO. <br />MR. KONTOULAS COMMENTED THAT THE FASTEST WAY TO GET GOING <br />WITH THE PROJECT WAS TO GO ACCORDING TO THE ORIGINAL SPECIFICATIONS, <br />AND COVER UP THE AREAS WITH DRYWALL. HE ADDED THAT THE DATA FOR THE <br />PANELING FOR THE COURTROOMS WAS IN MR. REINHOLD'S HANDS TO BE PRICED <br />OUT. MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT IF THEY GO TO PANELING, IT CAN GO <br />OVER THE DRYWALL. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON COMMENTED THAT THE JUDGES ARE VERY <br />CONCERNED ABOUT THE PANELING IN THEIR ROOMS. <br />� � i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.