My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/22/1980 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
10/22/1980 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:55 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:39:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Board of Fire Commissioners
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/22/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 2 21980 BooK 45 PAGE 88 <br />MR. PRESCOTT COMMENTED THAT HE DOES NOT LIVE IN THE SUBDI- <br />VISION AS THE OTHER COMPLAINANTS DID, AND HE FELT THAT IS A MAJOR <br />DIFFERENCE. <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THERE <br />IS NO DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAWN ON THE PLAT, AND MR. PRESCOTT STATED <br />THAT FORMER ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS HAD SAID THE DEVELOPER HAD TO <br />CUT THE DITCHES AND HAVE THE ROAD BUILT BEFORE THEY WOULD ISSUE PERMITS. <br />LATIONS. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT EXPLAINED THAT IS TRUE UNDER TODAY'S REGU- <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED THAT THIS PLAT WAS PUT ON RECORD <br />AS A MATTER OF CONVENIENCE. THE PROPERTY WAS SOLD BY METES AND BOUNDS, <br />AND THE ONLY WAY THEY COULD GET A BUILDING PERMIT WAS TO HAVE IT <br />RECORDED. THE INGRESS AND EGRESS DOES NOT EVEN MEET REQUIREMENTS, <br />AND THERE IS NO DRAINAGE SHOWN ON THE PLAT; NO DITCHES ARE CUT; AND <br />NONE ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. THE ADMINISTRATOR THEN READ ALOUD THE <br />FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION FROM THE PLAT OF HAEGER HIGHLAND SUBDIVISION: <br />CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL <br />T HE UNDERSIGNED DULY ACCREDITED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BOARD <br />OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA,DOES <br />HEREBY CERTIFY THAT SAID BOARD HAS DETERMINED THAT THE STREETS <br />AND EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC <br />USE AND THAT THEY ARE NOT, AND WILL NOT BE, A PART OF THE COUNTYS <br />SYSTEM OF PUBLIC ROADS; AND SAID BOARD HAS WAIVED A DEDICATION OF <br />THE SAME TO THE PUBLIC, AND HAS APPROVED THIS PLAT.THE STREETS <br />AND EASEMENTS WILL NOT BE IMPROVED OR MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY <br />UNTIL THERE IS A FORMAL ACCEPTANCE OF THESE STREETS AND/OR <br />EASEMENTS OR ANY PART THEREOF BY THE COUNTY., <br />APPROVED THIS/Z DAY OF ivy ,1975. <br />CFNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />MR. PRESCOTT STATED THAT IN THE MINUTES OF A PREVIOUS <br />MEETING ON THIS MATTER, THE COUNTY ATTORNEY STATED THAT IT WAS THE <br />RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY TO PURSUE THIS MATTER, AND HE ASKED IF <br />THE BOARD IS NOW CHANGING THEIR MIND ON THIS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED HIM THAT THE MINUTES HE READ DID <br />NOT HAVE SUCH A COMMENT IN THEM, AND WHAT THEY DID SHOW WAS THAT HE <br />SUGGESTED THE ADMINISTRATOR TALK TO THE VARIOUS PROPERTY OWNERS AND <br />ORGANIZE THEM FOR A SELF-HELP PROJECT TO TRY TO RELIEVE THE PROBLEM. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED THAT HE HAD A RECENT CONVERSATION <br />WITH FORMER ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS, WHO INDICATED THAT THIS PROBLEM <br />WAS NOT THE COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITY. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.