My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/14/2010
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2010
>
07/14/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2018 2:44:16 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:26:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Budget Workshop
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/14/2010
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4041
Book and Page
139, 628-664
Subject
Budget Workshop
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
9090
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
communication open. Chairman O'Bryan asked the Sheriff to inform his Department that this is <br />not a reflection on them, but purely an economic situation. <br />SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS — KAY CLEM <br />(Clerk's Note: This Item was heard prior to the Sheriff's presentation, and is placed here <br />for continuity). <br />Administrator Baird reported that the Supervisor of Elections's proposed Budget is <br />$1,001,962, a reduction of $30,990, or 3.0%. <br />Supervisor of Elections Kay Clem voiced concern over the dilemma of her Budget cuts <br />and where her office stands. She revealed that her Budget was cut by one-third, her full-time <br />staff was reduced by 46%, the number of votes increased by more than 25,000 voters, and that <br />her office is now at the 2003 spending level. She also explained and spoke about how she <br />reduced her own benefits, how she provides her staff with water and soft drinks, the elimination <br />of her temporary positions, the elimination of all advertising (except what is mandated by the <br />State), reduced absentee postage, the negotiation of the price for optical scan ballots, the cost of <br />felon investigations and mailings, the costs of the national change of address program, and the <br />additional costs in replacing servers and security equipment. Ms. Clem also voiced concern that <br />Sequoia Voting Systems had been purchased by another company, that three companies were <br />merging, and are laying people off. She said she does not have a back-up IT Manager, and was <br />worried that should there be a ballot tabulation problem, the vendor would not send someone <br />with the necessary experience. She requested to withdraw her proposed Budget to the Board <br />with a 2.55% decrease, and provide one that includes a 5% increase over the original Budget, so <br />she can take care of the aforesaid issues. <br />Administrator Baird said that he would meet with her during the next break to discuss <br />some of the items that he could assist her with. <br />20 <br />July 14, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.