My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/22/1980 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
10/22/1980 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:55 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:38:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Board of Supervisors
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/22/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 45 pAcc 68 <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS NOTED THAT ALTHOUGH <br />THE COST MAY BE EXCESSIVE, IF YOU COST IT INTO THE GIFFORD SYSTEM, <br />HE FELT THERE MAY BE FUNDS AVAILABLE FROM FMHA ITSELF, AND IT COULD <br />BECOME AVAILABLE THROUGH OUR OVERALL 20 MILLION GRANT. <br />ENGINEER ROBBINS AGREED THAT THERE COULD BE SOME OF THE <br />CONTINGENCY FUNDS LEFT OVER, AND THERE ALSO ARE PROJECT FUNDS LEFT <br />OVER. HIS ESTIMATION WAS THAT THERE WILL BE ABOUT $1.80,000 IN <br />CONTINGENCY, AND SOME OF THOSE FUNDS COULD BE USED TO OFFSET THE <br />COST UNDER A HUD BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT IT IS ALL TAX MONEY, AND <br />HE WAS NOT SURE THAT WE SHOULDNIT WAIT ON THAT AND USE SEPTIC TANKS <br />UNTIL THE NORTH COUNTY PLANT GOES IN. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED THAT IF WE CAN PUT IN A PART OF <br />WHAT WE HAVE GOT FIGURED AS A PART OF THE 201 FACILITIES PLAN, MAYBE <br />WE SHOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT OPPORTUNITY. IF THIS IS NOT PART <br />OF A TOTAL INTEGRATED PLAN, COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT THE COST <br />IS EXCESSIVE TO SPEND FOR A SMALL SUBDIVISION. <br />ENGINEER ROBBINS CONTINUED DISCUSSING TRYING TO TI -E THIS <br />IN WITH THE 201 PLAN AND POSSIBLY WORKING WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT DID NOT FEEL THE BOARD WOULD WANT TO GIVE <br />DIRECTION TO INCLUDE THIS IN THE COMMUNITY BLOCK DEVELOPMENT PREAPPLI- <br />CATION BECAUSE IT WOULD AMOUNT TO OVER 1/3 OF THE FUNDS REQUESTED. <br />THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR CONCURRED THAT THIS WOULD MUDDY <br />UP THE APPLICATION AND THAT ANY SOLUTION WOULD BE THROUGH FMHA. THE <br />BOARD AGREED THAT THIS SHOULD NOT BE TIED IN WITH THE COMMUNITY <br />DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION. <br />ENGINEER ROBBINS THEN DISCUSSED COST SHARING PROGRAMS, PART <br />THROUGH HUD AND PART THROUGH FMHA. HE STATED THAT IF THE BOARD DE- <br />SIRED, HE COULD MAKE SOME INQUIRIES THROUGH VARIOUS FUNDING PROGRAMS <br />TO FIND OUT IF THERE ARE ANY FUNDS AVAILABLE, <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED AS TO THE FACT THAT $500,000 TO ADD 177 <br />FAMILIES TO THE SYSTEM WOULD NOT BE COST EFFECTIVE, BUT IF THIS WERE <br />PART OF AN OVERALL PLAN, THEN THE MONEY MIGHT NOT BE WASTED AND IT <br />WOULD NOT HURT TO MAKE FURTHER INQUIRIES. <br />68 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.