My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/19/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
11/19/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:55 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:43:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/19/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOV 19 19 80 eooK 45. pAcE 309 <br />HAS BEEN SIGNED, AND THE AGREEMENT WOULD NOT BE WORKED OUT UNTIL THE <br />BOARD APPROVED IT. HE NOTED THAT LAMER ALREADY HAS SENT THE COUNTY <br />A CHECK. <br />ENGINEER ROBERT "FLIP" LLOYD, REPRESENTING THE LAMER PROJECT, <br />INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE MET WITH UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER, AND <br />EXPLAINED THAT LAMER, WHICH HAS PURCHASED A PLANT AND CAN INSTALL IT <br />IF NECESSARY, WISHED TO CONNECT TO THE COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT AT SEA <br />WATCH. HE NOTED THAT THEY WOULD TIE INTO THE EXISTING FORCE MAIN, <br />AND THE LENGTH OF THE TEMPORARY FORCE MAIN WOULD JUST BE THAT PART <br />THAT CROSSES IN FRONT OF VISTA DEL MAR, OR A DISTANCE OF ABOUT <br />500-600'. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS DID NOT FEEL WE ARE CONCERNED SO MUCH ABOUT <br />THE SPECIFICS, BUT JUST WISH EVERYBODY TO BE IN CONCURRENCE, HE <br />ASKED IF THERE IS ENOUGH CAPACITY FOR VISTA DEL MAR ALSO, <br />WOULD BE. <br />UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER DID NOT KNOW WHAT THEIR REQUIREMENTS <br />ENGINEER LLOYD REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE SUBMITTED ALL THE <br />REQUESTED MATERIAL TO UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE US GET <br />AWAY FROM THIS PARTICULAR AGREEMENT FORM, THE REASON BEING THAT THIS <br />AGREEMENT ANTICIPATES THAT THE COUNTY IS GOING TO TAKE OVER OWNERSHIP <br />RIGHTS TO THE LINE, AND WHAT WE ARE DEALING WITH IN THIS INSTANCE IS <br />A TEMPORARY CONNECTION. HE CONTINUED THAT HE WAS CONCERNED ABOUT <br />THE IMPACT THAT LAMER IS GOING TO HAVE ON OUR OTHER ENGINEERING COSTS <br />WHEN WE PAY THE COUNTY'S COSTS TO HOOK INTO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, <br />AND HE FELT THAT LAMER SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL IMPACT <br />TO THE COUNTY. HE ALSO EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT LAMER STILL BEING <br />RESPONSIBLE TO THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES TO PAY VARIOUS FEES <br />AND COSTS THAT THE TOWN IS GOING TO WANT TO PASS ON TO THEM IN THE <br />WAY OF THE $187.50 PER CONNECTION CHARGE. THE ATTORNEY WENT ON TO <br />EXPRESS CONCERN ABOUT THE DESIGN OF THE LINE TO SEA WATCH AND TO BE <br />SURE THAT IF WE INTEND TO INCORPORATE IT IN THE OVERAL SYSTEM THAT <br />IT MEETS THE REQUIRED ENGINEERING STANDARDS. <br />HE STATED THAT HE WOULD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.