Laserfiche WebLink
r o � <br />NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH A MOTION APPROVING THE CONCEPT SUBJECT TO <br />AN AGREEMENT WITH A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME AND INCORPORATION OF <br />IMPACT FEES, STATING THAT THE COUNTY WILL ACCEPT THOSE TWO BUILDINGS <br />FOR SERVICE CONDITIONED UPON LAMER PAYING ALL EXPENSES TO THE COUNTY <br />THAT THEIR IMPACT MAY BRING AND ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE TO THE TOWN AND <br />CITY FOR THEIR OTHER CHARGES. HE WOULD NOT EXPECT THAT THE COUNTY <br />WILL OWN THAT LINE. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS DID NOT FEEL WE WOULD WANT IT. <br />ENGINEER LLOYD FELT THE AGREEMENT SHOULD STATE THAT IT IS <br />A TEMPORARY CONNECTION AND WILL BE TREATED AS SUCH. HE NOTED THAT <br />WHEN PERMANENT CONNECTIONS ARE AVAILABLE, THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE <br />DIVORCED AND PUT BACK IN THE OTHER CATEGORY, AND HE AGREED THAT ANY <br />COSTS TO THE COUNTY DUE TO THIS TEMPORARY CONNECTION SHOULD BE BORNE <br />BY LAMER. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO APPROVING THE AGREEMENT SUBJECT <br />TO THE CHAIRMAN'S APPROVAL, COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED THAT HE <br />WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE AGREEMENT COME BACK TO THE BOARD BECAUSE THERE <br />ARE THREE ENTITIES INVOLVED, AND COMMISSIONER FLETCHER AGREED THAT HE <br />WOULD LIKE A CHANCE TO REVIEW THE DOCUMENT. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE DID NOT FEEL IT SHOULD BE THE COUNTY'S <br />RESPONSIBILITY TO DRAW THE AGREEMENT, AND SUGGESTED THAT THE DEVELOPER <br />SHOULD HAVE IT DRAWN UP FOR OUR ATTORNEY TO REVIEW. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COM- <br />MISSIONER WODTKE, FOR CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT <br />WITH LAMER FOR TEMPORARY SEWER CONNECTION) THE AGREEMENT TO COME BACK <br />TO THE BOARD AT THE NEXT MEETING FOR FINAL AUTHORIZATION. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER WISHED TO HAVE "CONCEPTUAL" APPROVAL <br />DEFINED, AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT THE BOARD IS SAYING WE <br />APPROVE THE IDEA OF THEIR MAKING A TEMPORARY CONNECTION TO OUR SEWER <br />SYSTEM BASED ON THE GENERAL DISCUSSION WE HAVE HAD TODAY AND BASED <br />ON AN AGREEMENT TO BE REVIEWED BY OUR ATTORNEY AND BROUGHT BACK TO <br />THIS BOARD FOR APPROVAL. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />� NOV 19198Q 65 <br />