Laserfiche WebLink
DEC 3 19 80 81oaK 45 PACE 346 <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER REFERRED TO THE FIRST PROPOSAL <br />GIVEN BY ATTORNEY HENDERSON WHERE HE MENTIONED BEACH COLONY, MR. <br />REVER STATED HE WOULD LIKE, IF THIS IS TO BE CONSIDERED, THAT THE <br />NAME BEACH COLONY IS NOT MENTIONED° HE SUGGESTED JUST SAYING "ANY <br />OTHER DEVELOPMENT BY THIS DEVELOPER IN THE GENERAL AREA", BECAUSE <br />THEY MATY. CHANGE THE NAME. <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED THAT THIS WOULD BE AGREEABLE. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />FLETCHER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED NOT TO REQUEST AN ATTORNEY <br />GENERAL'S OPINION ON THIS PARTICULAR MATTER. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT TO ACCEPT THE <br />SECOND PROPOSAL OFFERED BY ATTORNEY HENDERSON, AND IT WAS DECIDED TO <br />ADJOURN AND -CONTINUE THE DISCUSSION AFTER THE CITY COUNCIL HAS ITS <br />MEETING. <br />THE BOARD THEN ADJOURNED AT lO:OO O'CLOCK A.M. TO ALLOW THE <br />CITY COUNCIL TO CONDUCT ITS MEETING. <br />THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESUMED THEIR MEETING <br />AT 10:50 O'CLOCK A.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS STATED THE BOARD HAD TO DECIDE WHETHER OR <br />NOT TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL OF FLORIDA LAND COMPANY TO LET THEM <br />CONTINUE WITH ONE DEVELOPMENT, AND IF THE DEVELOPER WANTED TO PURSUE <br />THE SECOND DEVELOPMENT, WOULD STOP AND OBTAIN A BINDING LETTER. <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON INTERJECTED THAT HE WOULD LIKE THE BOARD <br />TO CONSIDER THAT PROPOSAL WITHDRAWN AT THIS TIME, UNTIL A DECISION <br />IS REACHED THIS AFTERNOON FOR ITEM IID ON THE AGENDA, <br />THE BOARD HAD NO OBJECTION. <br />DISCUSSION ON INDIAN RIVER BLVD. EXTENSION NORTH TO BARBER AVE. <br />THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL: <br />