My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/3/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
12/3/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:55 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:44:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/03/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED ATTORNEY COLLINS ABOUT THE <br />REFERENCE IN DR. BURNS' LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 23RD IN WHICH HE <br />QUOTED FLORIDA STATUTES AND STATED THEY WERE FORMALLY NOTIFYING <br />THE COMMISSION THAT A HAZARD EXISTS ON 16TH STREET. HE NOTED THAT <br />THIS APPARENTLY REFERS TO THE FOLLOWING: "ANY HAZARD THE SCHOOL <br />BOARD FINDS ON HIGHWAYS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO A SCHOOL ARE TO BE <br />REPORTED WITHIN 24 HOURS TO THE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY WITH JURISDIC- <br />TION." COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THIS STATUTE WOULD BE MORE IN <br />REFERENCE TO AN EMERGENCY SITUATION, SUCH AS A FALLEN TREE, ETC, <br />HE AGREED WE NEED TO DO THE WORK, BUT THE FACT THAT WE ARE PROCEEDING <br />UNDER THIS APPROACH ON BEHALF OF THE SCHOOL BOARD CONCERNED HIM. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT AFTER THAT LETTER WAS WRITTEN, <br />THE COUNTY DID RESPOND, AND WHETHER OR NOT THE REQUEST WAS THE TYPE <br />OF HAZARD MEANT BY THE STATUTE, HE FELT IS DUBIOUS. HE ALSO FELT <br />THERE IS SOME QUESTION AS TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE FACT THAT <br />PLACES THE RESPONSIBILITY ON THE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY RATHER THAN <br />THE SCHOOL BOARD, BUT BELIEVED AT THIS POINT, THE BOARDS ACTIONS <br />ARE OVER AND ABOVE ANYTHING REQUIRED AND THAT WHAT WE ARE DOING IS <br />A VOLUNTARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE BOARD RATHER THAN ANYTHING <br />REQUIRED. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR SHOW <br />HIM ON THE MAP EXACTLY WHAT IS PROPOSED, AND ADMINISTRATOR NELSON <br />EXPLAINED THAT THE BIKE PATH TERMINATES AT THE EDGE OF THE ROAD. <br />THERE IS A PAINTED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING; THEY WANT TO CREATE A SIDEWALK <br />TO TIE THE STREET TO THE BIKE PATH. HE POINTED OUT ON THE MAP WHERE <br />THE BRIDGE WILL.GO OVER THE CANAL AND NOTED THAT THE CONSTRUCTION <br />WOULD BE THE SIDEWALK AND A FOOT BRIDGE; THE TRAFFIC WILL STOP WHERE <br />THERE IS A STOP LIGHT NOW. THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THEY WILL <br />PUT ADDITIONAL SIGNS THERE, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO PUT IN A ZEBRA <br />HATCHMARK ON THE ROAD FOR MORE VISIBILITY. <br />DISCUSSION AROSE ABOUT FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT, AND THE <br />ADMINISTRATOR FELT THEY SHOULD BE TAKEN FROM FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER NOTED THAT WHERE THE FUNDING WAS <br />TO BE TAKEN FROM WAS LEFT BLANK ON THE ADMINISTRATOR'S MEMO, AND <br />HE FELT HE MIGHT HAVE TO WITHDRAW HIS MOTION. <br />DEC 31990 29 Rook 45 F4. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.