Laserfiche WebLink
$6.50 A MONTH IF THE COUNTY REQUESTS IT. IF THE PROPERTY OWNERS <br />DISSOCIATION REQUESTS THIS, THE MONTHLY CHARGE IS THE SAME, BUT THE <br />ASSOCIATION WOULD HAVE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE POLE; THIS COULD <br />AMOUNT TO $3,000-$4,000 FOR A COUPLE OF LIGHTS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE <br />REITERATED THAT WE NEVER HAVE APPROVED ANYTHING LIKE THIS BEFORE <br />EXCEPT THROUGH A STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT, AND HE HOPED WE DO NOT <br />APPROVE THIS BECAUSE IT WOULD CAUSE A LOT OF BOOKWORK AND HE FELT <br />THIS LIGHT SHOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON COMMENTED THAT HE BELIEVED THIS IS A <br />SAFETY PROBLEM, WHICH HE REALIZED IS NOT THE PROBLEM OF THE COUNTY. <br />HE STATED THAT HE DID NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE POLE CHARGE, BUT <br />WEST SIDE RACQUET CLUB HAS AGREED TO PAY IN ADVANCE AND WE WOULD <br />HAVE TO WORK OUT AN AGREEMENT WITH WEST SIDE TO PROVIDE $100 A YEAR <br />FOR 10 YEARS. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED THAT HE CONCURRED WITH COM- <br />MISSIONER WODTKE, <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE, TO DENY THE REQUEST OF WEST SIDE RACQUET CLUB. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED THAT BASICALLY HE HAD TO AGREE <br />WITH THIS; ALTHOUGH, HE DID UNDERSTAND THE DESIRE OF THE CITIZENS <br />TO HAVE LIGHTS IN SPECIFIC PLACES, HE NOTED THAT, AN EXAMPLE, <br />THERE IS A POLE AT VICKERS ROAD AND U.S.1 AND THE BULB WAS BROKEN; <br />HE ASKED IF THERE IS SOME AUTHORITY WHEREBY THE COUNTY CAN GET <br />INVOLVED TO HELP PEOPLE OUT IN CERTAIN AREAS WITHOUT GETTING INTO <br />A TAXING DISTRICT. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT IF THERE I.S A POLE ALREADY <br />THERE, HE BELIEVED FP&L WILL PUT A LIGHT ON THE POLE AND JUST CHARGE <br />THE FLAT FEE PER MONTH, AND THEY WILL DO THIS FOR PRIVATE ORGANIZA- <br />TIONS OR INDIVIDUALS. IF, HOWEVER, YOU WANT A POLE INSTALLED, YOU <br />WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR THE POLE, THE INSTALLATION, AND THEN SO MUCH <br />PER MONTH. HE CONTINUED THAT WE HAVE HAD NUMEROUS REQUESTS OF THIS <br />TYPE, AND HE BELIEVED WE ARE TRYING INTHE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TO <br />BE SURE THE DEVELOPER GETS THE LIGHTS IN THERE. THE TAXING DISTRICT <br />IS THE ALTERNATIVE TO A PROPERTY OWNERS GROUP, AND THE TAXING <br />DISTRICT GIVES FP&L THE AUTHORITY TO GO IN AND INSTALL THE LIGHT. <br />DEC 31980 mac m <br />33 <br />