My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/5/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
12/5/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:56 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:46:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/05/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEC 51980 <br />a©m -45 PAGF 417 <br />MR. REINHOLD STATED THAT HE CAN ONLY REFER TO DIFFERENT <br />LETTERS WHICH MENTION THE $400, HE NOTED THAT YESTERDAY WHEN THEY HAD <br />THE MEETING, THE COVER PAGE HAD NOT BEEN TYPED, <br />MR. KONTOULAS, ADMINISTRATOR NELSON, AND CHAIRMAN LYONS <br />CONCURRED THAT $300 WAS ALL THAT MENTIONED YESTERDAY. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD ASKED HOW THE CONTRACTOR WOULD JUSTIFY <br />$400 ON ONE BUILDING AND $300 ON THE OTHER. <br />MR. REINHOLD POINTED OUT THAT IT IS JUSTIFIED BECAUSE WE <br />ARE TALKING ABOUT TWO DIFFERENT PROJECTS AND TWO DIFFERENT CONTRACTS. <br />THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IS ABOUT FIVE TIMES AS LARGE AN AREA, <br />HE CONTINUED THAT THEY DON `T PAY ANY ELECTRIC BILLS FOR WORKING <br />AT THE COURTHOUSE, BUT RIGHT NOW THEIR ELECTRIC BILLS AT THE ADMINIS- <br />TRATION BUILDING ARE RUNNING $500-$600 A MONTH. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO WHETHER THIS IS THE FIRST TIME <br />THE $400 FIGURE HAS BEEN ON A CHANGE ORDER, MR. REINHOLD STATED <br />THAT IF THE FILES ON THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING.WERE CHECKED, A <br />FIGURE OF $400 WOULD BE FOUND ON CHANGE PROPOSALS. MR. KONTOULAS <br />DID NOT AGREE AND FELT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT JUST CAME UP RECENTLY. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS DID NOT BELIEVE THAT UP TO NOW WE HAVE HAD +' <br />ANY CHANGE ORDERS THAT INCLUDED EXTRA TIME AND POSSIBLY THAT IS WHY <br />THE OVERHEAD FIGURE WAS NOT IN THE CONSIDERATIONS UP TO THIS TIME. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD ASKED IF THE $400 FIGURE IS SPELLED OUT <br />IN THE CONTRACT OR WHETHER IT JUST CAME UP DURING THE COURSE OF <br />CONSTRUCTION. <br />MR. REINHOLD REPLIED THAT THEY DOCUMENTED THIS IN LETTERS <br />WITH THE ARCHITECT. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK ASKED IF THE COUNTY AUTHORIZED THE <br />ARCHITECT TO GO TO $400 A DAY. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT THE <br />CONTRACT BECAUSE HE DID NOT KNOW OFFHAND. HE ASSUMED THAT THE BOARD <br />WANTED TO AHEAD AND APPROVE THE CHANGE ORDER AND ASKED IF IT COULD <br />BE APPROVED ON THE BASIS THAT WE WILL VERIFY THE VALIDITY OF THE <br />$400 FIGURE SO THAT WE CAN MOVE AHEAD WITH THE WORK AND GET THIS <br />QUESTION SETTLED AT THE SAME TIME, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.