Laserfiche WebLink
MR, REINHOLD STATED THAT IF THE JOB RUNS PAST THE COMPLE- <br />TION DATE, THEY HAVE A DOCUMENTED RECORD OF THE ITEMS, EACH CHANGE <br />HAS A TIME ON IT, AND IT IS EVALUATED AND DISCUSSED WITH THE ARCHI- <br />TECT AND MR, KONTOULAS, <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE <br />TO DOCUMENT IN ORDER TO SEE HOW MUCH THESE VARIOUS CHANGES COST US, <br />ATTORNEY SOVIERO AGREED AND FELT WE MUST KEEP A RUNNING <br />RECORD AND THAT IN ORDER FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO BE COMPENSATED, IT <br />WOULD HAVE TO BE FOR ITEMS DONE AT THE OWNER °S REQUEST, HE ALSO <br />AGREED THAT WE DO NOT WANT TO WAIVE ANY RIGHTS AND FELT A TABULATION <br />SHOULD BE KEPT ON SITE AS TO WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF EACH CHANGE ORDER, <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT WE HAVE <br />NOT JEOPARDIZED OR WAIVED ANY RIGHTS, BUT THAT IT WOULD MAKE MATTERS <br />CLEARER IF WE HAD A LETTER RESERVING OUR RIGHTS, IT WAS ALSO AGREED <br />THAT WHEN A CHANGE ORDER COMES TO THE. COMMISSION, IT WOULD BE HELPFUL <br />IF A HISTORY OF WHO INITIATED IT AND WHY WERE INCLUDED, <br />MR, KONTOULAS COMMENTED THAT IF SOMETHING IS THE ARCHITECTS <br />FAULT, HE DOUBTED THEY WOULD WRITE IT ON THE CHANGE ORDER, BUT STATED <br />HE WOULD BE GLAD TO POINT IT OUT IF IT WERE THEIR FAULT, <br />MR, KONTOULAS NEXT WENT ON TO DISCUSS CHANGE ORDER #5 FOR <br />THE COURTHOUSE WHICH COVERS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: <br />0 <br />•�1 <br />BOOK 45 PA;E 410 <br />