12/31/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DEC 311980 45 P�6� 5,3 MR. ROBBINS STATED THAT HE DOES NOT AS YET HAVE THE BID IN HAND FROM DRIVEWAYS, INC. AND CANNOT PRESENT A BID SUMMARY, BUT HE WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT THAT AT THE NEXT MEETING AND MAKE A FORMAL RECOMMENDATION. HE NOTED THAT THE RESULT OF THE ACTION TO HAVE -THE POND CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE ALTERED HAS PUT THE PROJECT BACK WHERE WE CAN BUILD IT UNDER THE PROJECT FUNDS AND WITHIN OUR ESTIMATED BUDGET. HE CONTINUED TO REVIEW THE FIGURES PRESENTED IN THE PROJECT COST SUMMARY AND EXPLAINED THAT SECTION VI - ADDITIONAL WORK REQUIRED RELATES TO THE PINE VIEW PARK WATER LINE RENOVATION, ON WHICH IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE WORK BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SEWAGE PLANT WAS IN SO THAT WE COULD EFFECT A $20,000 SAVINGS. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK QUESTIONED THE FIGURE FOR LEGAL FEES LISTED IN SECTION III, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THE FIGURE REPRESENTS LITIGATION WITH RAYMOND .JACKSON OVER THE PROPOSED SITE ON KINGS HIGHWAY AND THAT IT MIGHT ALSO INCLUDE BOND ATTORNEY'S FEES. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD SUPPLY A BREAKDOWN. COMMISSIONER FLETCHER QUESTIONED THE $19,255 INCLUDED UNDER SEC. III - LEGAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND INTEREST FOR EQUIPMENT PURCHASE. MR. ROBBINS EXPLAINED THAT THIS REPRESENTED SOME EQUIPMENT NEEDED BY THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT TO OPERATE THE SYSTEM IN THE - INTERIM; -THE TRANSACTION DID GO THROUGH THE COUNTY COMMISSION AND DID HAVE FHA APPROVAL SO IT WAS TAKEN OUT OF THE CONTINGENCY FUNDS AVAILABLE. HE AGREED THAT THIS ITEM MAY HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE WRONG LOCATION. 201 PLAN ENGINEER ROBBINS ADVISED THE COMMISSION THAT THE VERO REACH CITY COUNCIL DID ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 201 PLAN, AND THAT HE WILL FORWARD THIS TO THE EPA VERY QUICKLY. UPDATE 0N SOUTH COUNTY WATER PROJECT UTULITIES DIRECTOR GEORGE LINER STATED THAT THE UPDATE ON THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER PROJECT IS VERY WELL COVERED IN THE FOLLOWING MEMO FROM ENGINEER .JOHN ROBBINS: 22