Laserfiche WebLink
JAN 28 1981 45 <br />PAC IE1 00 <br />, <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD QUESTIONED THE REASON FOR THE DOUBLE DOG- <br />LEG IN THE PROPOSED ROAD, AND MR. FLOOD STATED THAT THIS IS CAUSED <br />BY THE NEED TO GO AROUND THE SAND MINES LOCATED ON THE HYATT PROPERTY. <br />HE CONTINUED THAT THEY HAVE TALKED TO MR. HYATT ABOUT REDUCING THE <br />SIZE OF THE SAND MINE AND POSSIBLY WHEN HE FILLS THE AREA IN, A <br />DOGLEG CAN BE TAKEN OUT. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO THE PROCEDURES AND PROBLEMS <br />INVOLVED IN GETTING THE RAILROAD TO CONSENT TO AN ADDITIONAL CROSSING. <br />MAYOR FLOOD FELT THE RAILROAD'S MAIN OBJECTION TO ADDITIONAL CROSSINGS <br />RELATES TO THE MAINTENANCE OF THE CROSSING. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE COUNTY NEVER HAS BEEN IN- <br />VOLVED IN OPENING UP A CROSSING; ALTHOUGH, WE HAVE IMPROVED EXISTING <br />CROSSINGS AND HAVE ABOUT 15 MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS WITH THE RAILROAD <br />NOW, HE FELT HEARINGS ARE INVOLVED TO ESTABLISH THE NEED FOR THE <br />CROSSING, AND HE ALSO FELT THE RAILROAD WOULD OPPOSE IT, BUT DID NOT <br />KNOW TO WHAT EXTENT, ATTORNEY COLLINS CONTINUED THAT COST ESTIMATES <br />WOULD BE NEEDED IN REGARD TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CROSSING AND THE <br />SIGNALIZATION THAT WOULD BE NECESSARY, AND THESE ARE SUBSTANTIAL COSTS, <br />MAYOR FLOOD FELT THERE IS FEDERAL MONEY AVAILABLE FOR THIS <br />PURPOSE. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY WOULD PROCEED AND DO ANY LEGWORK <br />THE BOARD DESIRED AND REPORT BACK. HE EMPHASIZED THAT THE PLANNING <br />DEPARTMENT IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE PROPOSED ROAD IS NEEDED AS PART <br />a <br />OF THE OVERALL PLAN TO TIE OUR ROAD SYSTEM TOGETHER. <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE ACCESS ROUTES <br />AND BUILDING STANDARDS WERE DISCUSSED. COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THE <br />CONSTRUCTION OF THE SCHOOL WOULD HELP GET PAST THE RAILROAD'S NEGA- <br />TIVE ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE CROSSING AND HE ALSO BELIEVED WE MIGHT BE <br />ABLE TO GET SOME GRANT FUNDS. HE WAS IN FAVOR OF WORKING OUT A <br />SOLUTION WITH THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN AND STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE <br />TO HAVE MAYOR FLOOD PROCEED IN THE DIRECTION HE IS HEADING AND COME <br />BACK WITH FURTHER INFORMATION. <br />THE BOARD CONCURRED. <br />MAYOR FLOOD COMMENTED THAT HE BELIEVED HE COULD SPEAK FOR <br />THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN IN STATING THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE <br />IN PROCURING A COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEER BECAUSE THEY HAVE PROBLEMS <br />THAT MUST BE FACED. <br />