My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/28/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
1/28/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:16 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:51:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/28/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� r � <br />CHANGE ORDER #13 <br />MR. KONTOULAS REVIEWED CHANGE ORDER #13, WHICH INCLUDES <br />FIVE CHANGE PROPOSALS. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN RE THE CONTRACTOR <br />REFLECTING ADDITIONAL DAYS OVERHEAD COSTS AT $400 PER DAY WHILE <br />WE STILL HAVE NOT ACCEPTED ANYTHING BEYOND $300 PER DAY AND ALSO <br />ABOUT THE LETTER FROM THE CONTRACTOR RE LAPSED TIME WHERE INSTEAD <br />OF CHANGING THE FIGURE PROPOSED, HE WOULD SEEK THE DIFFERENCE IN <br />ADDITIONAL DAYS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT SEE THAT THIS WAS A REAL PROBLEM <br />BECAUSE WE ALREADY HAVE GIVEN THE CONTRACTOR 30 OR SO ADDITIONAL <br />DAYS, AND HE FELT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT CONCURRENT TIME FRAMES WHICH <br />ALREADY HAVE BEEN GRANTED. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS NOTED THAT WE WILL HAVE TO ARGUE ABOUT <br />F <br />CRITICAL PATHS WHEN WE GET TO THE END AND CAN LOOK AT THE OVERALL <br />PICTURE., <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER NOTED THAT ON ONE SHEET ATTACHED <br />TO THE CHANGE ORDER, THE ARCHITECT HAS MADE THE COMMENT THAT 5 <br />ADDITIONAL DAYS TO ACCOMPLISH THE WORK ON CP #39 IS "PREPOSTEROUS." <br />MR. KONTOULAS EXPLAINED THAT THE DOOR COVERED IN THIS <br />ITEM IS IN THE COMPUTER ROOM OFF THE FINANCE DIRECTOR'S AREA. THE <br />ORIGINAL PLAN SHOWED AN EXISTING DOOR WHERE THERE ACTUALLY WAS NONE, <br />WHICH IS THE ARCHITECT'S ERROR, AND IT NOW WILL ENTAIL CUTTING THE <br />MASONRY OUT TO PROVIDE THIS DOOR. HE AGREED THAT 5 ADDITIONAL DAYS <br />IS TOO MUCH. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER NOTED THAT MR. KONTOULAS IS RECOM- <br />MENDING THAT THE BOARD APPROVE THIS WHEN OBVIOUSLY THE ARCHITECT <br />DOESN'T APPROVE THE ADDITIONAL TIME, AND MR. KONTOULAS POINTED OUT <br />THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE THE DOOR. COMMISSIONER FLETCHER CONTINUED TO <br />QUESTION THE ARCHITECT'S COSTS AND THE CONTRACTOR'S COSTS AND NOTED <br />THAT THERE IS AN ITEM OF PANELING REPAIR ON CP #39 WHICH IS EXCLUDED <br />WITH THE NOTE THAT IT CANNOT BE PRICED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL DIRECTION. <br />MR, KONTOULAS FELT THIS REFERS TO AN EXISTING PANEL IN <br />THE COMPUTER ROOM WHICH HE BELIEVED WAS COVERED IN ANOTHER CHANGE <br />ORDER. MR. FLETCHER STATED THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO RELY ON HIS FAITH <br />IN MR, KONTOULAS' ABILITY TO KEEP ON TOP OF ALL OF THIS. <br />JAN 2 8 1981 37 ..PAS CD3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.