Laserfiche WebLink
Fr'_ 'I <br />FEB 25 1981 sow-'�4 145 PkcE 88 7 <br />MR. KONTOULAS REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD CONSIDER AND ACCEPT <br />CHANGE ORDER N0. 15 — COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, WHICH HE HAD <br />JUST RECEIVED IN THE MAIL. HE EXPLAINED THAT THESE TWO DOORS WERE <br />DISCUSSED SOMETIME AGO, BUT THE INFORMATION GOT LOST IN THE ARCHI— <br />TECT�S OFFICE, THE ORIGINAL PLANS HAD ALUMINUM DOORS AND FRAMES, <br />WHICH WILL NOT. MEET -CODE, AND IT IS, THEREFORE, IMPERATIVE THAT THE <br />PROPER DOORS BE ORDERED. THIS INVOLVES THE NORTH DOOR JUST EAST OF <br />THE TWO ELEVATORS AND THE DOOR THAT LEADS INTO THE EMPLOYEES LOUNGE. <br />MR, KONTOULAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER N0. 15, <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED A TIME OF SIX HOURS TO SUPER— <br />VISE INSTALLATION OF THESE DOORS. MR. KONTOULAS EXPLAINED THAT THE <br />ORIGINAL DOORS WERE TO BE PUT IN BY A SUB—CONTRACTOR AND NOW REINHOLD'S <br />MEN WILL DO THIS WORK. <br />MR. SNODGRASS OF REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION CONFIRMED THAT HE NOW <br />WILL HAVE THEIR CREWS DO THIS BECAUSE THE SUB—CONTRACTOR IS A STOREFRONT <br />CONTRACTOR WHO WORKS IN ALUMINUM AND.GLASS, NOT STEEL, AND HE CANNOT <br />INSTALL THE FIRE—RATED DOORS. MR. SNODGRASS POINTED OUT THAT THE <br />CHANGE PROPOSAL REGARDING THESE DOORS WAS IN THE WORKS APPROXIMATELY <br />THREE MONTHS, AND THEY STILL ARE WAITING FOR THESE DOORS. HE FELT THIS <br />IS AN EXAMPLE OF A DELAY THE CONTRACTOR CANNOT GO ON TOLERATING OR THE <br />BOARD EITHER. <br />MR. KONTOULAS REPORTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR HAS WRITTEN THE <br />ARCHITECT ABOUT THIS PROBLEM, AND THEY NOW HAVE A NEW MEMBER OF CONNELL, <br />METCALF & EDDY COMING UP HERE, A MR. GRAZIANI. THE FIRST MAN THEY SENT <br />UP HAD A SERIOUS PHYSICAL PROBLEM AND HAD TO LEAVE. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER ASKED MR. SNODGRASS FOR A POSSIBLE <br />COMPLETION DATE, <br />MR, SNODGRASS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT TODAY HE WAS FORCED TO <br />WRITE A LETTER TO THE ARCHITECT WITHDRAWING THEIR PROPOSAL ON THE FIRE— <br />WALLS BECAUSE THE VALIDITY OF THEIR PROPOSAL EXPIRED A FEW DAYS AGO; <br />THEY CANNOT MAKE A PROPOSAL THAT CAN BE ACCEPTED JUST ANY TIME SOMEONE <br />GETS AROUND TO IT. HE STATED HE WOULD LIKE A SET PERIOD OF 15 DAYS <br />RESPONSE TIME. <br />AS TO A POSSIBLE COMPLETION DATE, HE BELIEVED THE <br />47 <br />