Laserfiche WebLink
CONTRACT TIME WAS UP IN JULY, BUT HE NOW WOULD ANTICIPATE THAT THEY <br />HAVE BEEN DELAYED Z TO 3 MONTHS, AND HE WOULD HAZARD A GUESS AT <br />OCTOBER FOR A COMPLETION DATE. HE STATED THAT THEY NOW HAVE THE <br />HARDWARE WHICH THEY DELAYED IN ORDERING BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT TOLD <br />WHAT HARDWARE WAS WANTED. <br />MR. KONTOULAS COMMENTED THAT MR. SNODGRASS HAD TO WORK ON <br />HIS PROPOSAL REGARDING THE FIREWALLS OVER THREE WEEKS AND NOW IS ONLY <br />ALLOWING US 15 DAYS TO RESPOND, WHICH HE DID NOT FEEL WAS ADEQUATE. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO HOW WE CAN BEST AVOID THESE <br />DELAYS IN GETTING CHANGE ORDERS THROUGH. MR. SNODGRESS COMMENTED <br />THAT THE ARCHITECT PREVIOUSLY HAD BEEN SENDING A REPRESENTATIVE UP <br />MORE FREQUENTLY, <br />MR. KONTOULAS EXPLAINED THAT THEY FIRST INITIATED THE <br />AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT TO SEND A REPRESENTATIVE UP HERE THREE <br />DAYS A WEEK, BUT WHEN THEY FELT THEY WERE OVER THE HUMP, THEY CUT <br />THIS DOWN TO TWO DAYS AND THEN TO ONE DAY PER WEEK. NOW, HOWEVER, <br />SOME OTHER THINGS HAVE DEVELOPED, BUT MR. KONTOULAS STILL FELT THAT <br />HAVING MR. GRAZIANI COME UP ONE DAY A WEEK WAS SUFFICIENT. HE NOTED <br />THAT THE CHARGE FOR HIS SERVICES IS $300 PER DAY, OR $900 PER WEEK FOR <br />THREE DAYS. <br />DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO THE NEED FOR THE REPRESENTATIVE TO <br />BE HERE MORE FREQUENTLY TO SHORTEN DELAY IN RESPONSE TIMES, AND THE <br />COST FOR HIS SERVICES AS OPPOSED TO ALL RELATED COSTS, I.E., OUTSIDE <br />LEASES, TELEPHONE EXPENSE, THE CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD EXPENSES FOR <br />ADDITIONAL DAYS, ETC. THE CHAIRMAN FAVORED HAVING THE ARCHITECT S <br />REPRESENTATIVE AVAILABLE MORE FREQUENTLY. <br />MR. KONTOULAS DISCUSSED DELAYS AS RELATED TO THE SCHEDULED <br />COMMISSION MEETINGS, AND IT WAS EMPHASIZED THAT THE BOARD HAS AGREED <br />THAT THEY WILL MEET ANY TIME NECESSARY TO DEAL WITH CHANGE ORDERS. <br />CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE COMPLEX <br />PROBLEM OF COSTLY DELAYS, AND INTERESTED CITIZEN, WILLIAM KOOLAGE, <br />URGED THAT THE BOARD CHECK FURTHER INTO THE COSTS PER DAY FOR THE <br />HIRING OF A MAN FROM THE ARCHITECT S OFFICE TO WORK ON SITE SEVERAL <br />DAYS A WEEK AS OPPOSED TO THE COST OF THE DELAYS CAUSED BY NOT HAVING <br />HIM ON THE JOB. <br />m <br />FEB 251991 <br />80014. �g PAGES$8- <br />