Laserfiche WebLink
s _ � <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED THAT HE HAS SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS <br />WITH THE CONCEPT OF JUST PUMPING SAND ON THE BEACHES, BUT THE PROPOSED <br />ACTION WOULD BE SIMILAR TO THAT OF THE CITY IN THAT WE WOULD NOT BE <br />ACTUALLY ACCEPTING THE PROGRAM, BUT JUST GETTING IN LINE IF WE SHOULD <br />CHOOSE TO PARTICIPATE; SO, HE, THEREFORE, WOULD VOTE IN FAVOR. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER BIRD, TO AUTHORIZE THE FIRM OF ARTHUR V. STROCK AND ASSOCIATES, <br />FOR A TOTAL DOLLAR FIGURE NOT TO EXCEED $300, TO PREPARE AND FILE AN <br />APPLICATION TO THE D.E.R. TO REQUEST FUNDING OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />BEACH RESTORATION PROGRAM. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER OBJECTED TO THIS ACTION AS ENCOURAGING <br />THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS TO CONTINUE "MILKING EVERY DUCK THEY CAN FIND." <br />HE FELT PUMPING SAND ON THE BEACHES IS AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY AND <br />COMMENDED THE GROUP WHO DID THEIR OWN SANDBAGGING BY THE DRIFTWOOD. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE FIRM PREPARING THIS APPLICA- <br />TION IS AN ENGINEERING FIRM, AND IT SHOULD BE MADE CLEAR THAT THE BOARD <br />IS NOT HIRING AN ENGINEERING FIRM, BUT JUST AUTHORIZING COMPLETION OF <br />A FORM TO BE SUBMITTED. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD FELT SINCE THERE ISN'T ANY ACTUAL ENGINEERING, <br />INVOLVED, WE SHOULD BE CAPABLE OF DOING THIS IN-HOUSE. COMMISSIONER <br />SCURLOCK POINTED OUT THAT WE ARE ONLY GETTING THIS DONE AT THE $300 <br />PRICE BECAUSE THIS FIRM IS INVOLVED IN DOING THE WORK FOR THE CITY OF <br />VERO BEACH. HE BELIEVED IT WOULD COST US MORE THAN $300 TO DO THE <br />WORK OURSELVES SINCE THEY ARE ALREADY IN THE PROCESS. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THE APPLICATION WOULD COME BACK <br />TO THE BOARD FOR REVIEW BEFORE FILING, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT <br />THAT THE DEADLINE IS THE LAST WEEK IN FEBRUARY. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED <br />THAT THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT OBLIGATE US TO ACCEPT FUNDS OR PARTICI- <br />PATE IN THE PROGRAM. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED 4 TO 1 WITH COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN OPPOSITION. <br />FEB 251981 <br />70 90UK 45 Pari 91 <br />