4/1/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 VERY LITTLE INTEREST WAS SHOWN BY MEMBERS OF THE WHITE COMMUNITY. HE FELT IT WOULD BE A GRAVE MISTAKE FOR THE COMMISSION NOT TO MOVE FORWARD AND GIVE THEIR FULL APPROVAL AT THIS TIME. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER BIRD, TO APPROVE THE SITE LOCATION REQUESTED BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT SITE WITH THE FOLLOWING UNDERSTANDING: (1) THAT THE PROJECT AS PROPOSED IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT ZONING; (2) THAT IT IS A SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT; (3) THAT IT WILL TIE INTO THE COUNTY'S NORTH COUNTY WATER SYSTEM; _(4) THAT IT WILL TIE INTO THE COUNTY'S NORTH COUNTY SEWER SYSTEM; AND (5) THAT IT WILL ADHERE TO THE NORMAL SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED CHAIRMAN EGAN IF THOSE REPRESENTATIONS WERE CONSISTENT WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY'S PLAN, AND MR. EGAN STATED THAT THEY WERE. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED WITH A 3 TO I VOTE, COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN OPPOSITION AND COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK BEING ABSENT. I., PRESENTATION BY LEEDY CORPORATION RE JUNIOR BONDS FOR RENOVATION INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS PRESENTED LAOMIS LEEDY, III, OF THE LEEDY CORPORATION. MR. THOMAS COMMENTED THAT NOW THAT WE HAVE ESTABLISHED THE NEED FOR THE ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX RENOVATIONS,_THE SOONER WE CAN ACT, THE SOONER WE CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE ARBITRAGE FEATURE AND INVEST THE FUNDS, HE FELT THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY MR.. LEEDY WAS QUITE CLEAR. e CHAIRMAN LYONS STATED THAT'HE HAD READ THE RESUME LEEDY CORP. FURNISHED AND KNEW THEY HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN A LARGE NUMBER OF ISSUES. HE WAS CURIOUS WHY THERE WAS SO LITTLE ACTIVITY IN 1979 AND NOTHING IN 1980.