Laserfiche WebLink
DEPARTMENT HAD GIVEN THE DEVELOPER SOME PLANNING DESIGNS, AND AFTER <br />THE PLAN WAS DRAWN, IT WAS FELT THAT ANOTHER ACCESS SHOULD BE , <br />PROVIDED. HE ADDED IT WOULD BE DESIRABLE TO HAVE A RIGHT—OF—WAY <br />ON 6TH STREET. <br />ATTORNEY'COLLINS NOTED THAT THE BOARD HAS THE OBLIGATION <br />TO LOOK TO THE FUTURE FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS IN SUBDIVISIONS. <br />MR. FREDERICK STATED 'THAT IT SEEMED A LITTLE UNFAIR TO PUT <br />MONEY IN ESCROW FOR INFINITY FOR THE PAVING OF HALF—ROADS, <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE WORDING TO BE USED IN THE <br />DEDICATION. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT IF IT IS THE BOARDS INTENT <br />TO APPROVE THE PLAT AND HAVE THE ROAD USED BY OTHERS, HIS RECOMMENDA— <br />TION WOULD BE TO HAVE THE MOTION STATE THIS FACT IN THE DEDICATION. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON SUGGESTED THAT THIS ITEM BE REMOVED <br />FROM THE AGENDA AT THIS TIME AND THAT IT BE REFERRED TO THE <br />ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE FOR FURTHER STUDY. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS FELT IT COULD BE APPROVED NOW AND THE <br />QUESTION ABOUT THE ESCROW FUNDS COULD BE SETTLED AT THE TIME OF <br />FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. <br />377- COMMISSIONER BIRD COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD DOES HAVE THE <br />OPTION OF WHETHER OR NOT TO ELIMINATE THE POSTING OF ESCROW FUNDS. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF SHADY OAKS SUBDIVISION <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING MEMORANDUM; <br />WITH THE BOARD: <br />M . <br />16 <br />