4/15/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

COMMISSIONER BIRD AGREED WE NEED TO LOOK AT THE OVERALL PICTURE, BUT DID NOT FEEL WE SHOULD INCONVENIENCE THIS DEVELOPER ANY MORE. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH HOPEFULLY WILL TAKE CARE OF THIS SITUATION. COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED THAT HE WOULD NOT WANT THIS PARTICULAR REZONING TO SET A PRECEDENT BECAUSE HE PERSONALLY VIEWED THE LAND ALONG THE RIVER AS ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AND WOULD LIKE TO SEE ITS USE LIMITED TO ONE UNIT PER 3 ACRES, COMMISSIONER BIRD INQUIRED IF THIS IS GOING TO NECESSITATE GOING BACK BEFORE THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OR WHETHER WE CAN BRING IT DIRECTLY BACK TO THE COUNTY COMMISSION. ATTORNEY COLLINS RECOMMENDED THE BOARD DISPENSE WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF THE ZONING COMMISSION SINCE THEY ALREADY HAVE MADE A RECOMMENDATION ON THIS MATTER. COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH THAT AND WOULD ADD IT TO THE MOTION. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK CONCURRED. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION ON THE MOTION FOR THE COUNTY COMMISSION TO INITIATE ACTION TO REQUEST A REZONING OF THE APPLICANT S ENTIRE PIECE OF PROPERTY TO R-213, SAID REZONING TO COME DIRECTLY BACK TO THE COUNTY COMMISSION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ATTORNEY HENDERSON POINTED OUT THAT HIS CLIENT FORMALLY AMENDED HIS PETITION TO R-21) BEFORE A VOTE WAS TAKEN, AND IF THAT WAS NOT VOTED DOWN, HE WOULD LIKE IT TO BE ACTED UPON. HE NOTED THAT THE MOTION WAS TO DENY THE ZONING TO R -2B. ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT THE RECORD SHOWS THE OFFER TO CHANGE TO R -2D AND THAT THE DENIAL TO REZONE WAS A TOtAL DENIAL. ORDINANCE 81-14 - REZONING PROPERTY IN J. A. HUDSON SUBDIVISION, REQUESTED BY'ELDON J. PERRY THE HOUR OF 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: APR151981 37 BOOK PAg 2-5 , _: