5/20/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

77 m RECOMMEND THAT THE MATTER BE READVERTISED IN WHATEVER DIRECTION ' THE BOARD MIGHT SUGGEST. HE EXPLAINED THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAD CALLED HIS OFFICE TO ASK IF THE SHORTFALL IN THE NOTICE WAS SATIS- FACTORY AND THEY HAD BEEN ADVISED THAT IT WAS. COMMISSIONER BIRD WISHED IT CONFIRMED THAT THE DORANS WERE OPPOSED TO R -2B OVER ALL AND WOULD PREFER THAT THE PROPERTY STAY AS IT IS ATTORNEY HENDERSON AGAIN STATED THAT THEY WOULD PREFER THAT THE BOARD RECONSIDER HIS CLIENTS ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR REZONING OF ONLY THE C -IA PARCEL, AND IF THE BOARD SHOULD AGAIN CHOOSE TO DENY IT, THEN LET THE PROPERTY STAY ZONED AS IT IS JUST LIKE THE REST OF THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH OF THEM. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING DUE TO A TECHNICALITY RELATING TO INSUFFICIENT NOTICE. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO HOW TO READVERTISE. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER FLETCHER TO DIRECT THE ATTORNEY TO READVERTISE THE ENTIRE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR REZONING TO R -2D AS PER RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK NOTED THAT WE WENT THROUGH A LOT OF DISCUSSION AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING, AND IT WAS THE CONSENSUS AT THAT TIME TO REZONE TO R -2B, HE BELIEVED A NUMBER OF ELEMENTS WERE CON- SIDERED AT THAT TIME AND THAT WE CAME UP WITH A GOOD COMPROMISE. ONJIOTION.MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER BIRD, THE BOARD BY A 4 TO I VOTE, COMMISSIONER FLETCHER'VOTING IN OPPOSITION, AUTHORIZED READVERTISEM€NT OF THE ENTIRE SUBJECT -PROPERTY AT R -2B. - -COMMISSIONER-FLETCHER INQUIRED_IF THE BOARD. COULD AT THIS - TIME ENTERTAIN.A MOTION DIRECTING THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO INITIATE - A.NEW CATEGORY -FOR. -LANDS WITHIN THE -IOO YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. .TN GENERAL DISCUSSION, IT WAS FELT THAT THIS SHOULD BE HELD OVER UNTIL.A LATER MEETING WHEN"A MAP CAN BE PREPARED TO SHOW WHAT AREA THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ENCOMPASSES. _