Laserfiche WebLink
MAS 6- PnE" 505 <br />ATTORNEY STEVE HENDERSON CAME FORWARD REflRESENTING THE DORANS <br />AND -ENUMERATED . TH-E VAR I-OUS SURPR-I SES W I TH . WH ICH . H I S CLIENTS HAVE BEEN.- <br />CONFRONTED <br />EEN.CONFRONTED - THE DISCOVERY THAT THEIR ACREAGE WAS.5 ACRES-LESS THAN <br />LISTED ON THE TAX.ROLL; THE COUNTY COMMISSION'S.DENIAL OF THE PLANNING <br />& ZONING COMMISSION'-S UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION -IN FAVOR OF REZONING <br />THE-C-IA PORTION-OF THE SAID PROPERTY TO R-2B AND-SUBSEQUENT READVER- <br />TISEMENT TO REZONE THE ENTIRE PARCEL TO R-2B; THE STATEMENT-MADE BY _ <br />MR. REVER THAT THIS HAD.BEEN INFORMALLY.REFERRED TO THE.PLANNING & <br />ZONING BOARD-WITHOUT ANY NOTICE-T-O THE DORANS AND THAT BOARD NOW CONCURS <br />-WITH .R-2B FOR THE ENTIRE-TRACT; THE STATEMENT BY ATTORNEY COLL.INS THAT <br />AVERAGING DENSITIES; WHICH HAS BEEN DONE FOR MANY YEARS, IS NOT PROPER; <br />AND THE FACT THAT THE COUNTY COMMISSION IS NOW TALKING ABOUT R-2D. <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON FELT CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO THE FACT THAT THE <br />FRONT SECTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS BEEN ZONED COMMERCIAL FOR <br />A NUMBER OF YEARS AND R -2B -IS DEFINITELY AN UPGRADING. HE FURTHER <br />FELT THE FACT THAT THE BAORD IS SINGLING OUT THLSPARTICULAR PROPERTY <br />FOR REZONING MAKES THIS ACTION ARBITRARY, AND, THEY, THEREFORE, WOULD <br />AGAIN INITIATE THEIR REQUEST FOR REZONING THE FRONT SECTION OF THE - <br />PROPERTY ONLY TO R -2B, IF THE BOARD IS UNWILLING TO APPROVE THIS, <br />THEY THEN REQUEST THAT THE PROPERTY BE LEFT AS IT IS. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER AGREED THAT WE SHOULD MAKE THIS AREA <br />MORE CONSISTENT INSTEAD OF SINGLING OUT ANY PROPERTY AND STATED THAT <br />HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MOTION DIRECTING OUR PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO <br />INITIATE A NEW PLANNING CATEGORY FOR THOSE LANDS LYING WITHIN THE <br />FLOOD PLAIN NOT TO EXCEED TWO UNITS PER ACRE. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS LIKED THE IDEA, BUT FELT THAT THIS IS NOT <br />THE TIME TO GO INTO IT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HAD BEEN UNDER THE IMPRESSION <br />THAT THE DORANS WERE IN FAVOR OF THE R -2B ZONING. HE INFORMED THE <br />BOARD THAT THERE IS A TECHNICAL DEFECT IN THAT THE NOTICE THAT WAS <br />SENT OUT WAS TWO DAYS SHORT OF THE TIME REQUIRED, AND RATHER THAN <br />PROCEED WITH THIS HEARING WITH THE OPPOSITION OF THE DORANS, HE WOULD <br />Iq <br />