5/20/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MAI 20 1981 - Far 54- - _COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK FELT THE.RESIDENTS OF THOSE SIX LOTS _ _ EVENTUALLY WILL -COME TO THE BOARD COMPLAININ-G THAT ALL THE ROADS ARE PAVED EXCEPT IN FRONT OF THEIR SIX LOTS,_AND.COMMI-SSIONER BIRD COULD NOT UNDERSTAND -WHY, WITH ALL THE OTHER LOTS FRONTING.ON A PAVED ROAD, THE DE-VELOPER DOE-SN'T WANT TO PAVE -THIS ONE MR..SCHMUCKER EXPLAINED THAT MOST OF THE ROADS -WERE EXISTING; THEY ONLY BUILT THE HALF ROAD AND JUST WISH TO FURNISH AN ACCESS EASEMENT, - - COMMISSIONER-SCURLOCK FELT.THAT BASICALLY THEY -ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE, AND HE DID NOT SEE ANY HARDSHIPA - MR, SCHMUCKER CONTINUED TO ARGUE ABOUT WHETHER THIS ROAD IS- A PARALLEL ACCESS ROAD OR NOT, AND COMMISSIONER BIRD POINTED OUT THAT IT IS A ROAD WITHIN THE.SUBDIV-ISION AND SHOULD BE PAVED IN ANY EVENTS MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER BIRD, TO ACCEPT THE ADMINISTRATOR'S.RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF ROSELAND ACRES SUBDIVISION_BASED ON REQUIRING THE PAVING OF THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF -THE MARGINAL ACCESS ROAD ALONG COUNTY ROAD 5121 DISCUSSION AROSE ABOUT WHETHER THE INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNERS OF THESE SIX LOTS*COULD HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO FELLSMERE ROAD, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF CURB CUTS, ETC. IT WAS AGREED THERE SHOULD BE LIMITED INGRESS AND EGRESS, AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD_VOTE AGAINST THE MOTION IF THE LOT OWNERS COULD GO DIRECTLY OUT ONTO FELLSMERE ROAD. ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT SEE ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS SUBDIVISION AND OTHER SUBDIVISIONS WITH ACCESS ROADS, ENGINEER SCHMUCKER FELT COMMISSIONER WODTKE IS SAYING THAT SINCE THESE PARTICULAR LOTS FRONT ON FELLSMERE ROAD, THEY COULD BE CULVERTED AND GO ACROSS TO FELLSMERE ROAD. ATTORNEY COLLINS BELIEVED IF SOMEONE WANTED TO GO TO THAT EXTREMITY, THEY COULD, BUT FELT THIS SITUATION EXISTS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED 4 TO 1 WITH COMMISSIONER WODTKE VOTING IN OPPOSITION. 6