My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/3/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
6/3/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:17 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:09:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/03/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN 31981 - <br />BOOK 46 PAGE 638 <br />BE MANUFACTURED BY ALLIS-CHALMERS; IT IS A FRENCH DERIVATIVE AND VERY <br />DIFFICULT TO GET PARTS FOR. <br />DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO WHY WE BID ONLY TOTAL COST, AND THE <br />ADMINISTRATOR FELT THE COMMISSION HAD AGREED THAT TOTAL COST BIDDING <br />WAS THE WAY TO GO FOR QUALITY, AND NOTED THAT IT, IN ADDITION, ALLOWS <br />YOU TO PROJECT WELL INTO THE FUTURE BECAUSE OF THE GUARANTEED.TRADE-I'N <br />VALUE. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD AGREED THAT THE TRADE-IN FIGURES SPEAK FOR <br />THEMSELVES AS COMPARED BETWEEN REWIND AND KELLY, <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER INQUIRED IF A BID WAS RECEIVED FROM <br />INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR NOTED THAT SIX REQUESTS <br />WERE SENT OUT AND FOUR REPLIES RECEIVED, TWO OF WHICH WERE NO BIDS. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO THE POSSIBILITY THAT THE NO BIDS WERE DUE <br />TO THE REQUIREMENT OF TOTAL COST BIDDING AND THE POSSIBILITY THAT THERE <br />MIGHT BE SOME COMPANIES WITH COMPARABLE EQUIPMENT WHO WILL NOT BID <br />TOTAL COST, IT WAS -GENERALLY AGREED THAT WE SHOULD KEEP OUR OPTIONS <br />OPEN AND BID BOTH WAYS. ADMINISTRATOR NELSON AGREED THAT THIS WILL BE <br />DONE IN THE FUTURE. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AWARDED BID #84 FOR A CATERPILLAR D6 <br />DOZER TO KELLY TRACTOR CO. IN THE AMOUNT OF $123,845 AS RECOMMENDED <br />BY THE BID COMMITTEE; FUNDING FROM ACCOUNT #411-217-534-66.49. <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR NEXT REVIEWED BID #85 AS FOLLOWS: <br />Bid 1185 - Pump for Irrigation Svstem at New Administration Buildin <br />7 Bid Proposals sent out, 3 received <br />United Irrigation Co. 15-30 days to complete 3123.00)(Low Bidder) <br />Jacobs Electric Co. 15-30 days to complete 4195.00 <br />McCullers-Howard Co. 15-30 days to complete 4988.00 <br />Recommend Bid #85 be awarded to the low bidder, United Irrigation. <br />Fund Account #301-130-519-66.51 <br />THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION IN REGARD TO THE LARGE DIFFERENCE <br />BETWEEN THE LOW BIDDER AND THE HIGH BIDDER, AND IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT <br />THE HIGH BIDDER BID 10 H.P. RATHER THAN 7.5 H.P. BY MISTAKE. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.