My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (03)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (03)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 4:33:46 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:01:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (3)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendments 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 4 Transportation Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13455
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element <br />As reflected in the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the county actively <br />encourages Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) principles in the planning process. Unlike <br />traditional sprawl development, TND communities are characterized by residential, commercial, <br />and employment centers in close proximity to one another. Although the number of these <br />communities is small, proposed new TND developments, such as Liberty Park, may reduce trip <br />lengths in those areas. To facilitate increased development of TND projects, the county will need <br />to remove the impediments that make approval of TND projects more arduous than conventional <br />development. As an initial step, the county should adopt a new policy in the Land Use Element <br />permitting TND development as an allowable use in existing zoning districts. <br />By encouraging mixed use development such as Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) <br />projects, infill development, Transit Oriented Development projects, and residential projects near <br />employment centers, the county can improve the jobs/housing ratio. In addition, the county <br />should adopt a new policy in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan that ensures that the <br />jobs -housing balance by subarea (north, central, and southern county) is not lowered beyond 2005 <br />baseline values when land use changes are made to the county's Future Land Use Map. This will <br />provide a means to gauge the county's overall success in the creation of jobs in close proximity to <br />housing and the resulting decrease in trip lengths. <br />• Connectivity <br />Currently, the county requires developers to incorporate connectivity strategies into new <br />development projects. These strategies include requiring internal street connections between <br />adjacent subdivisions; requiring multiple entranceways to adjacent thoroughfare roadways; <br />requiring marginal access roadways along arterials; and requiring pedestrian connections <br />between neighborhoods and within commercial development. Several factors, however, limit the <br />creation of interconnected roadway systems. These include: <br />■ Physical constraints such as canals, FDOT outfall ditches, existing development, and <br />other factors that physically preclude connections. <br />■ Opportunity constraints relating to "piece -meal" development of individual projects <br />over time vs. the opportunity to coordinate individual projects at the same time (e.g. <br />South County Initiative). <br />■ Opportunity constraints relating to the "funneling effect", whereby there is only one <br />potential inter -connection that leads through a small existing neighborhood from a <br />large project. Such situations, where significant traffic from a large project would be <br />funneled through a street serving a few residences, should be avoided. <br />■ Objections from existing residents potentially affected by proposed connections. Such <br />objections and concerns are widely reported in localities across the nation and stem <br />from fears of increased traffic, "cut -through" traffic, and attendant nuisance and <br />safety concerns. Existing residents rarely perceive that a proposed interconnection <br />will provide access benefits that outweigh the potential adverse impacts. <br />Consequently, connectivity requirements are easier to implement in areas with few or <br />no existing residents. <br />Because interconnections between adjacent developments are beneficial for the reasons <br />identified above, the county should adopt new comprehensive plan policies in the Land Use <br />Community Development Department Indian River County 115 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.